Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):266-271.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

[Ultrasound assessment of gastric antrum in term pregnant women before elective cesarean section]

[Article in Portuguese]
Caio Klippel Amaral  1 , Márcio Luiz Benevides  2 , Marília Marquioreto Benevides  3 , Diogo Leite Sampaio  1 , Cor Jesus Fernandes Fontes  4
Affiliations

[Ultrasound assessment of gastric antrum in term pregnant women before elective cesarean section]

[Article in Portuguese]
Caio Klippel Amaral et al. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Pregnant women are considered patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents. The study aim was to evaluate the gastric antral cross-sectional area using ultrasound.

Method: In this prospective study, 85 scheduled term pregnant women underwent gastric ultrasound. The outcomes were the measurement of the gastric antral cross-sectional area (main outcome), the estimated gastric volume, the incidence of pregnant women at risk for pulmonary aspiration, and the association between gastric antral cross-sectional area and clinical-demographic characteristics. Gastric antral cross-sectional area and gastric volume were compared according to body mass index <30 or ≥30.

Results: The median (IIQ) for gastric antral cross-sectional area was 4 cm2 (2.8–6.3), for the estimated gastric volume it was 49.8 mL (33.7–87.2), and for the gastric volume estimated in mL.kg−1 it was 0.62 mL.kg−1 (0.39–0.95). The 95th percentile [95% confidence interval (CI)] of the gastric antral cross-sectional area and the estimated gastric volume were ≤10.3 cm2 (95% CI: 7.6–15.6) and 1.42 mL.kg−1 (95% CI: 1.20–2.64), respectively. The incidence of pregnant women at risk for pulmonary aspiration was 3.5% (CI: 3.5 (1.2–9.8)). There was a positive correlation between gastric antral cross-sectional area and weight, p < 0.001 and body mass index <0.001. Patients with a body mass index ≥30 had a gastric antral cross-sectional area and an estimated gastric volume greater than those with a body mass index <30, respectively, p < 0.01 and p < 0.02.

Conclusion: Measuring the gastric antral cross-sectional area of pregnant women is feasible and easy. There was positive correlation between gastric antral cross-sectional area, body weight and body mass index. The estimation of gastric volume by measuring the gastric antral cross-sectional area can identify patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration. Obese patients had a gastric antral cross-sectional area and an estimated gastric volume greater than non-obese patients.

Keywords: Antro gástrico; Aspiration pneumonia; Caesarean section; Cesariana; Gastric antrum; Gestante; Pneumonia aspirativa; Pregnant women; Ultrasound; Ultrassonografia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasonographic image showing the measurement of the gastric antral cross-sectional area of a pregnant woman (F, liver; U, uterus; Ao, aorta). A and B are the antrum largest perpendicular diameters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the study patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cook T.M., Woodall N., Frerk C. Fourth National Audit Project Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:617–631. - PubMed
    1. Costantine M.M. Physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2014;3:65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zieleskiewicz L., Bellefleur J.P., Leone M. Upper airway management in obstetrics: results of a French survey. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:265–266. - PubMed
    1. Kinsella S.M., Winton A.L., Mushambi M.C., et al. Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:356–374. - PubMed
    1. Chassard D. Maternal deaths due to anesthesia complications. Results from the French confidential enquiry into maternal deaths, 2010–2012. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017;45(S12):S54–S57. - PubMed