Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun:101:129-142.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

Incorporating the social context into neurocognitive models of adolescent decision-making: A neuroimaging meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Incorporating the social context into neurocognitive models of adolescent decision-making: A neuroimaging meta-analysis

Jorien van Hoorn et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Neurobiological models of adolescent decision-making emphasize developmental changes in brain regions involved in affect (e.g., ventral striatum) and cognitive control (e.g., lateral prefrontal cortex). Although social context plays an important role in adolescent decision-making, current models do not discuss brain regions implicated in processing social information (e.g., dorsomedial prefrontal cortex). We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis using the Multilevel peak Kernel Density Analysis (MKDA) method to test the hypothesis that brain regions involved in affect, cognitive control, and social information processing support adolescent decision-making in social contexts (N = 21 functional neuroimaging studies; N = 1292 participants). Results indicated that dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus/insula and ventral striatum are consistently associated with adolescent decision-making in social contexts. Activity within these regions was modulated by the type of social context and social actors involved. Findings suggest including brain regions involved in social information processing into models of adolescent decision-making. We propose a 'constructionist' model, which describes psychological processes and corresponding neural networks related to affect, cognitive control, and social information processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
During adolescence, decision-making in social contexts elicits activation in brain regions implicated in social processing (dmPFC), affective sensitivity (insula, ventral striatum), and cognitive control (IFG).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Social influence decisions > Social outcome decisions and other social tasks elicits activity in regions implicated in social processing (IPL, TPJ, pSTS), highlighting the contribution of the social brain, although at a slightly less stringent threshold of p < .02 (B) Social outcome decisions > Social influence decisions and other social tasks yields activation in the VS. (C) Decision-making with known > unknown others yields activity in the VS (D) Decision-making with unknown vs known others yields activation in the subgenual ACC/amygdala.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambrosia M, Eckstrand KL, Morgan JK, Allen NB, Jones NP, Sheeber L, … & Forbes EE (2018). Temptations of friends: adolescents’ neural and behavioral responses to best friends predict risky behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 483–491. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert D, Chein J, & Steinberg L (2013). The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision-making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 114–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, & Poldrack RA (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(9), 2424–2433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aztil S, Parrish MJ, Satpute A, Shablack H, Brooks JA, & Lindquist KA (in preparation). A social dimension of the evaluative brain
    1. Barrett LF (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Publication types