Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar-Apr;8(2):118-124.
doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_15_19.

Application of intraoperative ultrasonography in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A single-center experience of recent 199 cases

Affiliations

Application of intraoperative ultrasonography in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A single-center experience of recent 199 cases

Feiya Yang et al. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the value and application experiences of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (ILUS) in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN).

Materials and methods: From January 2013 to December 2018, RLPN with ILUS was performed on the recent 199 patients in our center (two patients received bilateral RLPN due to suspected malignancy of both right and left sides), and the relevant clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 119 patients were male and 80 were female; the age of patients was 53.4 ± 12.3 years. Of all the renal tumors, 105 were located on the left side and 96 on the right side with a RENAL score of 6.6 ± 1.7. All the patients were diagnosed as or suspected of having a renal tumor by preoperative imaging examination. The ILUS was applied in all the operations to help locate the tumor, delineate the boundary, clarify the diagnosis, observe the blood supply, and so on.

Results: RLPN with ILUS in these 199 patients was successfully performed without conversion to open surgery. All surgeries were completed in 90.2 ± 21.7 min, with 73.6 ± 89.2 mL for estimated blood loss, and 19.3 ± 5.6 min for warm ischemia time. The tumor size was 3.6 ± 1.5 cm, and all the surgical margins were negative. The drainage days and postoperative hospital days were 4.7 ± 2.3 and 6.1 ± 2.3, respectively. The preoperative creatinine was 69.7 ± 19.4 μmol/L compared with 61.6 ± 12.7 μmol/L measured 1 month postoperatively. There were 17 cases of renal cell carcinoma no more than 1 cm, and they were resected without artery clamp or a large amount of blood loss. Satellite tumors were confirmed in 12 cases, of which 8 were not detected by preoperative examinations and finally found by ILUS during surgeries.

Conclusion: ILUS can alleviate the difficulty of preoperative diagnosis, facilitate surgical dissection, and improve the effect of nephron-sparing surgeries. Due to its great advantage, ILUS should further be promoted and applied.

Keywords: Intraoperative ultrasonography; laparoscopy; partial nephrectomy; renal tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) The probe of the ILUS was placed into the retroperitoneal space through the trocar and directly located on the surface of the kidney. (b) The ILUS could provide more information (tumor position, size, peripheral organs and tissue, etc.) for the surgeon. (c) The ILUS could clearly display the blood supply of the renal tumor. (d) After the renal artery was intermittently blocked, the ILUS could help us determine if the artery was completely blocked and there was accessory renal artery. ILUS: Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ILUS scanned a lesion inside the kidney and indicated the possibility of malignancy, which the preoperative CT only provided a vague imaging evidence to the clinicians and brought great difficulty for the accurate diagnosis. ILUS: Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography; CT: Computed tomography

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Rinott Mizrahi G, Freifeld Y, Klein I, et al. Comparison of partial and radical laparascopic nephrectomy: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes for clinical T2 renal cell carcinoma. J Endourol. 2018;32:950–4. - PubMed
    1. Doerfler A, Cerantola Y, Meuwly JY, et al. Ex vivo ultrasound control of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011;186:2188–93. - PubMed
    1. Ren T, Liu Y, Zhao X, et al. Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: A meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91978. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyams ES, Perlmutter M, Stifelman MD. A prospective evaluation of the utility of laparoscopic Doppler technology during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2011;77:617–20. - PubMed