Comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: A propensity score-matched study
- PMID: 31006712
- PMCID: PMC6859663
- DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_16_19
Comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: A propensity score-matched study
Abstract
This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (TRBx) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). We enrolled 2962 men who underwent transrectal (n = 1216) or transperineal (n = 1746) systematic 12-core prostate biopsy. Clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and prostate volume (PV) were recorded. To minimize confounding, we performed propensity score-matching analysis. We measured and compared PCa detection rates between TRBx and TPBx, which were stratified by clinical characteristics and Gleason scores. The effects of clinical characteristics on PCa detection rate were assessed by logistic regression. For all patients, TPBx detected a higher proportion of clinically significant PCa (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses illustrated that PV had a smaller impact on PCa detection rate of TPBx compared with TRBx. Propensity score-matching analysis showed that the detection rates in TRBx were higher than those in TPBx for patients aged >- 80 years (80.4% vs 56.5%, P = 0.004) and with PSA level 20.1-100.0 ng ml-1 (80.8% vs 69.1%, P = 0.040). In conclusion, TPBx was associated with a higher detection rate of clinically significant PCa than TRBx was; however, because of the high detection rate at certain ages and PSA levels, biopsy approaches should be optimized according to patents' clinical characteristics.
Keywords: Gleason score; biopsy; demography; propensity score; prostatic neoplasms.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures


Similar articles
-
A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Micro-ultrasound-guided Transrectal and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsies for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Sep 12;69:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.013. eCollection 2024 Nov. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39314912 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial.Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 3;5:16089. doi: 10.1038/srep16089. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26526558 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Transperineal or Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection.Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):805-811. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 19. Eur Urol Focus. 2024. PMID: 38508895
-
Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):688-696. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00352-1. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. PMID: 33767354 Review.
-
[Perineal prostate biopsy].Urologie. 2024 Sep;63(9):934-942. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02408-1. Epub 2024 Aug 19. Urologie. 2024. PMID: 39158686 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer.PeerJ. 2023 Dec 14;11:e16614. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16614. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 38107582 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Center Comparative Evaluation of Freehand Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Techniques Performed Under Local Anesthesia.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;15(15):1929. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151929. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40804892 Free PMC article.
-
A novel simplified transperineal prostate biopsy guided by perineal ultrasound.Br J Radiol. 2024 Jun 18;97(1159):1351-1356. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae097. Br J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38781498 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates.Open Med (Wars). 2024 Oct 2;19(1):20241039. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1039. eCollection 2024. Open Med (Wars). 2024. PMID: 39381428 Free PMC article.
-
Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.BMC Urol. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01176-y. BMC Urol. 2023. PMID: 36709292 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Emiliozzi P, Scarpone P, DePaula F, Pizzo M, Federico G, et al. The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2004;171:197–9. - PubMed
-
- Elabbady AA, Khedr MM. Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score. Eur Urol. 2006;49:49–53. - PubMed
-
- Giannarini G, Autorino R, di Lorenzo G. Saturation biopsy of the prostate: why saturation does not saturate. Eur Urol. 2009;56:619–21. - PubMed
-
- Zaytoun OM, Moussa AS, Gao T, Fareed K, Jones JS. Office based transrectal saturation biopsy improves prostate cancer detection compared to extended biopsy in the repeat biopsy population. J Urol. 2011;186:850–4. - PubMed
-
- Irani J, Blanchet P, Salomon L, Coloby P, Hubert J, et al. Is an extended 20-core prostate biopsy protocol more efficient than the standard 12-core? A randomized multicenter trial. J Urol. 2013;190:77–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous