Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;56(2):117-140.
doi: 10.1007/s11166-018-9279-1. Epub 2018 May 9.

Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method

Affiliations

Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method

Arthur E Attema et al. J Risk Uncertain. 2018.

Abstract

This study compares discounting for money and health in a field study. We applied the direct method, which measures discounting independent of utility, in a representative French sample, interviewed at home by professional interviewers. We found more discounting for money than for health. The median discount rates (6.5% for money and 2.2% for health) were close to market interest rates, suggesting that at the aggregate level the direct method solves the puzzle of unrealistically high discount rates typically observed in applied economics. Constant discounting fitted the data better than the hyperbolic discounting models that we considered. The substantial individual heterogeneity in discounting was correlated with age and occupation.

Keywords: Constant discounting; Direct method; Field study; Health versus money; Hyperbolic discounting; Time preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of a choice question
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Median and mean cumulative weighting functions for health and money
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relation between the area measures for health and money
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cumulative distribution functions of the discount rates for health and money

References

    1. Abdellaoui M, Attema AE, Bleichrodt H. Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. Economic Journal. 2010;120:845–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02308.x. - DOI
    1. Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O. Sign-dependence in intertemporal choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2013;47(3):225–253. doi: 10.1007/s11166-013-9181-9. - DOI
    1. Ahlbrecht M, Weber M. An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Science. 1997;43(6):813–826. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.43.6.813. - DOI
    1. Anderson LR, Stafford SL. Individual decision-making experiments with risk and intertemporal choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2009;38(1):51–72. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9059-4. - DOI
    1. Andreoni J, Sprenger C. Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review. 2012;102(7):3333–3356. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3333. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources