Late-Term Abortion and Medical Necessity: A Failure of Science
- PMID: 31008148
- PMCID: PMC6457018
- DOI: 10.1177/2333392819841781
Late-Term Abortion and Medical Necessity: A Failure of Science
Abstract
Roe V. Wade (1973) placed the concept of medical necessity at the center of the public discourse on abortion. Nearly a half century later, 2 laws dealing with late-term abortion, 1 passed in New York and 1 set aside in Virginia, are an indication that the medical necessity argument regarding abortion has been rendered irrelevant. More importantly for this discussion, these laws are an indication of the failure of the US scientific and medical communities to inform this consequential topic with transparency, logical coherence, and evidence-based objectivity.
Keywords: abortion; abortion access; late-term abortion; medical necessity; reasons for abortion; reporting.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Doe v. Bolton, 410 US 179 (1973).
-
- Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 US 914 (2000).
-
- Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37(3):110–118. doi:10.1363/3711005. - PubMed
-
- Foster DG, Kimport K. Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;45(4):210–218. doi:10.1363/4521013. - PubMed
-
- Skinner D. The politics of medical necessity in American abortion debates. Politics Gend. 2012;8(1):1–24.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
