Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study
- PMID: 31008301
- PMCID: PMC6453175
- DOI: 10.1177/2396987316678361
Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies that reported duplex-ultrasound cut-off criteria, based on blood velocity parameters, for the degree of stenosis in a stented carotid artery were either retrospective, or the reference test was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at duplex ultrasound, which is likely to have resulted in verification bias. We performed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy to find new blood velocity cut-offs in duplex ultrasound for in-stent restenosis.
Patients and methods: Stented patients within the international carotid stenting study were eligible. Patients had a carotid computed tomography angiography in addition to routine duplex ultrasound performed at a yearly follow-up. Duplex-ultrasound bloodflow velocity parameters were compared to the degree of stenosis on computed tomography angiography. The results were analysed using receiver-operating-characteristic curves.
Results: We included 103 patients in this study. On computed tomography angiography, 30 (29.1%) patients had a 30%-49% in-stent restenosis, 21 (20.4%) patients had 50%-69% in-stent restenosis and 5 (4.9%) patients a ≥70% in-stent restenosis. The cut-off value ≥50% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of 125 cm/s (sensitivity: 63% (95% CI: 41-79), specificity: 83% (95% CI: 72-90)).
Discussion: This study provides a level 2b evidence for new cut-off values for in-stent restenosis. Unfortunately, we could not say anything about severe stenosis because of the low number of severe stenosis after one year.
Conclusions: The 125 cm/s cut-off value on duplex ultrasound is lower than found in previous studies and equal to unstented arteries. Duplex-ultrasound measurements made in stented carotid arteries should not be corrected for the presence of a stent when determining the degree of stenosis.
Keywords: Stroke; computed tomography angiography; duplex ultrasound; restenosis; stenting.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Defining Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for In-Stent Restenosis of the Carotid Artery Using Computed Tomographic Angiography.Cureus. 2022 Jul 9;14(7):e26700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26700. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35949740 Free PMC article.
-
Role of carotid duplex in the assessment of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting.Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1226220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226220. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37965176 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study.BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-36. BMC Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19624830 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18178455
-
Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis.Vascular. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):119-25. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00030. Vascular. 2007. PMID: 17573016
Cited by
-
Defining Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for In-Stent Restenosis of the Carotid Artery Using Computed Tomographic Angiography.Cureus. 2022 Jul 9;14(7):e26700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26700. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35949740 Free PMC article.
-
[Role of duplex ultrasonography of the ophthalmic artery in internal carotid artery stenosis].Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;64(9):687-693. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01331-y. Epub 2024 Jun 20. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 38902538 German.
-
Unmasking the hidden culprit: Recurrent syncope in a 62-year-old man linked to severe internal carotid artery stenosis.Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Oct 4;20(1):42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.091. eCollection 2025 Jan. Radiol Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39429705 Free PMC article.
-
Role of carotid duplex in the assessment of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting.Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1226220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226220. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37965176 Free PMC article.
-
Restenosis and risk of stroke after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): secondary analysis of a randomised trial.Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jul;17(7):587-596. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30195-9. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Lancet Neurol. 2018. PMID: 29861139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Hobson RW. Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stent Trial (CREST) protocol. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194: S9–S14. - PubMed
-
- Featherstone RL, Brown MM, Coward LJ. ICSS Investigators. International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 18: 69–74. - PubMed
-
- Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, et al. NHS Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid Stenosis Imaging Group. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367: 1503–1512. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources