Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;2(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1177/2396987316678361. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study

Affiliations

Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study

Floris Tm Bosch et al. Eur Stroke J. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies that reported duplex-ultrasound cut-off criteria, based on blood velocity parameters, for the degree of stenosis in a stented carotid artery were either retrospective, or the reference test was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at duplex ultrasound, which is likely to have resulted in verification bias. We performed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy to find new blood velocity cut-offs in duplex ultrasound for in-stent restenosis.

Patients and methods: Stented patients within the international carotid stenting study were eligible. Patients had a carotid computed tomography angiography in addition to routine duplex ultrasound performed at a yearly follow-up. Duplex-ultrasound bloodflow velocity parameters were compared to the degree of stenosis on computed tomography angiography. The results were analysed using receiver-operating-characteristic curves.

Results: We included 103 patients in this study. On computed tomography angiography, 30 (29.1%) patients had a 30%-49% in-stent restenosis, 21 (20.4%) patients had 50%-69% in-stent restenosis and 5 (4.9%) patients a ≥70% in-stent restenosis. The cut-off value ≥50% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of 125 cm/s (sensitivity: 63% (95% CI: 41-79), specificity: 83% (95% CI: 72-90)).

Discussion: This study provides a level 2b evidence for new cut-off values for in-stent restenosis. Unfortunately, we could not say anything about severe stenosis because of the low number of severe stenosis after one year.

Conclusions: The 125 cm/s cut-off value on duplex ultrasound is lower than found in previous studies and equal to unstented arteries. Duplex-ultrasound measurements made in stented carotid arteries should not be corrected for the presence of a stent when determining the degree of stenosis.

Keywords: Stroke; computed tomography angiography; duplex ultrasound; restenosis; stenting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart. ICSS: international carotid stenting study; CTA: computed tomography angiography; DUS: duplex ultrasound; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Scatter plot of the degree of stenosis found on CTA (x-axis) correlated with the PSV in the ICA (a) and the PSV ICA/CCA ratio (b) (y-axis). ICA: internal carotid artery; CCA: common carotid artery; PSV: peak systolic velocity; CTA: computed tomography angiography.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ROC curves for the cut-off values for PSV in, respectively, (a) ≥30% stenosis (AUC 0.78; p-value ˂0.001; 95% CI 0.69–0.87); (b) ≥50% stenosis (AUC 0.73; p-value ˂0.001; 95% CI 0.61–0.85); and for the ICA/CCA ratio in (c) ≥30% stenosis (AUC 0.73; p-value ˂0.001; 0.63–0.83) and (d) ≥50 stenosis (AUC 0.73; p-value 0.001; 95% CI 0.61–0.86).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hobson RW. Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stent Trial (CREST) protocol. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194: S9–S14. - PubMed
    1. Featherstone RL, Brown MM, Coward LJ. ICSS Investigators. International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 18: 69–74. - PubMed
    1. International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 985–997. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 529–538. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, et al. NHS Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid Stenosis Imaging Group. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367: 1503–1512. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources