Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer
- PMID: 31008938
- PMCID: PMC6494235
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015175
Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer
Abstract
Background: Previous clinical studies have reported that full field digital mammography (FFDM) can be used for diagnosis on breast cancer (BC) with promising outcome results. However, no study systematically investigates its diagnostic impact on female patients with BC. Thus, this systematic review will assess the accurate of FFDM diagnosis on BC.
Methods: In this study, we will perform a comprehensive search strategy in the databases as follows: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDILINE, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information, and Wanfang Data from inception to February 28, 2019. All case-controlled studies exploring the impacts of FFDM diagnosis for patients BC will be fully considered for inclusion in this study. Two authors will independently scan the title and abstracts for relevance, and assess full texts for inclusion. They will also independently extract data and will assess methodological qualify for each included study by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan V.5.3 software (London, UK) and Stata V.12.0 software (Texas, USA) will be used to pool the data and to conduct the meta-analysis.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of FFDM will be used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM for the diagnosis of patients with BC.
Conclusion: Its findings will provide latest evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM in female patients with BC.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019125338.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Impact of contrast ultrasound diagnosis for patients with liver cancer.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15445. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015445. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31083175 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(38):e17192. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017192. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31567964 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of ultrasound diagnosis for chronic pelvic pain.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17281. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017281. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31574844 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital X-ray radiogrammetry on hand bone loss for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17280. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017280. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31574843 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 14. Eur J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25816990 Review.
Cited by
-
Study Protocol Titles: Erratum.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18;99(51):e18495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018495. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33371053 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- van Marcke C, Collard A, Vikkula M, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance in patients at high risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of gene-panel data. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;132:138–44. - PubMed
-
- Peairs KS, Choi Y, Stewart RW, et al. Screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2017;44:60–72. - PubMed
-
- Rojas K, Stuckey A. Breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:651–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical