Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;98(16):e15175.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015175.

Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer

Affiliations

Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer

Tuan Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical studies have reported that full field digital mammography (FFDM) can be used for diagnosis on breast cancer (BC) with promising outcome results. However, no study systematically investigates its diagnostic impact on female patients with BC. Thus, this systematic review will assess the accurate of FFDM diagnosis on BC.

Methods: In this study, we will perform a comprehensive search strategy in the databases as follows: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDILINE, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information, and Wanfang Data from inception to February 28, 2019. All case-controlled studies exploring the impacts of FFDM diagnosis for patients BC will be fully considered for inclusion in this study. Two authors will independently scan the title and abstracts for relevance, and assess full texts for inclusion. They will also independently extract data and will assess methodological qualify for each included study by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan V.5.3 software (London, UK) and Stata V.12.0 software (Texas, USA) will be used to pool the data and to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of FFDM will be used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM for the diagnosis of patients with BC.

Conclusion: Its findings will provide latest evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of FFDM in female patients with BC.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019125338.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Study Protocol Titles: Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18;99(51):e18495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018495. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33371053 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. van Marcke C, Collard A, Vikkula M, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance in patients at high risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of gene-panel data. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;132:138–44. - PubMed
    1. Tosello G, Torloni MR, Mota BS, et al. Breast surgery for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD011276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peairs KS, Choi Y, Stewart RW, et al. Screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2017;44:60–72. - PubMed
    1. Vanderpuye V, Grover S, Hammad N, et al. An update on the management of breast cancer in Africa. Infect Agent Cancer 2017;12:13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rojas K, Stuckey A. Breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:651–72. - PubMed

Publication types