Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):777-785.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0192.

Association of Cumulative Socioeconomic and Health-Related Disadvantage With Disparities in Smoking Prevalence in the United States, 2008 to 2017

Affiliations

Association of Cumulative Socioeconomic and Health-Related Disadvantage With Disparities in Smoking Prevalence in the United States, 2008 to 2017

Adam M Leventhal et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: Understanding emerging patterns of smoking disparities among disadvantaged populations can guide tobacco control policy.

Objective: To estimate disparities in smoking prevalence associated with the number of socioeconomic and health-related disadvantages faced by a population among US adults from 2008 to 2017.

Design, setting, and participants: Nationally representative cross-sectional annual household-based probability sample of US noninstitutionalized residents. Polytomous regression estimated associations of disadvantage variables, survey year, and their interaction with the following 3 pairwise contrasts: current vs never smoking (estimate of overall disparities), current vs former smoking (unique contribution of disparities in smoking cessation), and former vs never smoking (unique contribution of disparities in smoking initiation). The setting was in-home face-to-face interviews. Participants were respondents in 2008 to 2017 survey years who were aged 25 years or older (N = 279 559).

Exposures: Self-reported past-year unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, absence of high school diploma, disability/limitation interfering with daily functions, serious psychological distress on the Kessler 6-item screen, and at least 60 past-year heavy drinking days, each coded yes or no. These indicators were summed in a cumulative disadvantage index (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 or 6).

Main outcomes and measures: Self-reported current, former (ever smoked ≥100 cigarettes, had since quit, and not currently smoking), and never (<100 cigarettes) smoking.

Results: Among 278 048 respondents (mean [SD] age, 51.9 [16.8] years; 55.7% female) with data on smoking history (99.5% of the sample), the mean current smoking prevalence across 2008 to 2017 compared with populations without disadvantages was successively higher among populations with 1 disadvantage (21.4% vs 13.8%; current vs never smoking adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% CI, 2.27-2.43), 2 disadvantages (26.6% vs 13.8%; OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 3.39-3.72), 3 disadvantages (35.1% vs 13.8%; OR, 5.35; 95% CI, 5.05-5.66), 4 disadvantages (45.7% vs 13.8%; OR, 8.59; 95% CI, 7.91-9.34), or 5 or 6 disadvantages (58.2% vs 13.8%; OR, 14.70; 95% CI, 12.30-17.50). In current vs former and former vs never smoking status contrasts, ORs were lower but also showed successively greater associations with increasing cumulative disadvantage. Current (vs never) smoking odds significantly declined each year among populations with 0 (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.96), 1 (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97), or 2 (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) disadvantages but did not change across 2008 to 2017 among those with 3 or more disadvantages.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this study demonstrate that US disparities in smoking prevalence from 2008 to 2017 were successively larger with each additional disadvantage faced, were expressed in higher smoking initiation odds and lower smoking cessation odds, and widened over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Proportion of Current Smokers by Cumulative Disadvantagea in Each Year, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 to 2017b
aTotal number of the following disadvantages: unemployed, poverty, no high school degree, disability/limitation, serious psychological distress, and heavy drinking. The Methods section gives the operational definition of each form of disadvantage. The eMethods in the Supplement describes disability/limitation. bWeighted to the US population (n = 241 796).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Reports of the Surgeon General. Medline: 24455788 - PubMed
    1. Higgins ST, Kurti AN, Redner R, et al. . Co-occurring risk factors for current cigarette smoking in a U.S. nationally representative sample. Prev Med. 2016;92:110-117. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaalema DE, Leventhal AM, Priest JS, Higgins ST. Understanding individual differences in vulnerability to cigarette smoking is enhanced by attention to the intersection of common risk factors. Prev Med. 2018;117:38-42. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute Monograph 22: A Socioecological Approach to Addressing Tobacco-Related Health Disparities. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017.
    1. Williams JM, Steinberg ML, Griffiths KG, Cooperman N. Smokers with behavioral health comorbidity should be designated a tobacco use disparity group. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):1549-1555. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301232 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types