Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 22;14(4):e0215715.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215715. eCollection 2019.

Social preferences for ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot in South America

Affiliations

Social preferences for ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot in South America

Iñigo Bidegain et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Identifying which ecosystem services are relevant to different stakeholders and understanding stakeholders' perceptions of such services is useful for making informed decisions, especially in regions of the world where the achievement of biodiversity conservation goals is threatened by economically productive activities. In this article, we assess social preferences for ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot in central Chile. We use a consultative case study to ask local stakeholders (n = 70) from the Campana Peñuelas Biosphere Reserve to identify the most important ecosystem services the area provides for them and inquire about the perceived vulnerability of the services to changes in the future. We also explore the association between the perceived importance of ecosystem services and the sociodemographic and cultural characteristics of the respondents, which allows us to identify contrasting stakeholder perceptions of different ecosystem services. The most important services for local actors were the drinking water, fresh air and climate change control, genetic pool of plant communities in central Chile, and educational value. From the perspective of local actors, the services that could be threatened by negative changes in the future in terms of their provision included the possibilities of developing conservation activities focused on iconic threatened animal and plant species, water regulation, food from agriculture, and drinking water. Contrasting perceptions about the importance of ecosystem services emerged among stakeholders. While small farmers and members of local organizations attributed higher importance values to provisioning services, scientists and rangers and administrators of protected areas as well as teachers, NGO members and local government employees attributed more importance to the regulating and cultural services associated with threatened species. Our results can serve as a source of information for the planning and decision-making processes related to the search for socially and ecologically sustainable solutions for land use management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Location of the Campana Peñuelas biosphere reserve.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Graphical representation of the 11 services selected for analysis and their importance and vulnerability scores.
Fig 3
Fig 3
(A, B). RDA Biplot. To better visualize the results, the graphic was divided into two separate figures. Both were created with the results of the same analysis using all variables.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Dendrogram from the hierarchical cluster analysis.

References

    1. Kok MTJ, Kok K, Peterson GD, Hill R, Agard J, Carpenter SR. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustain Sci. 2017;12: 177–181. 10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48: 630–636.
    1. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 2009;68: 643–653.
    1. Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, et al. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22: 213–220.
    1. Asah ST, Guerry AD, Blahna DJ, Lawler JJ. Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosyst Serv. 2014;10: 180–186.

Publication types