Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 1:158:107609.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

Progress in agonist therapy for substance use disorders: Lessons learned from methadone and buprenorphine

Affiliations
Review

Progress in agonist therapy for substance use disorders: Lessons learned from methadone and buprenorphine

Chloe J Jordan et al. Neuropharmacology. .

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUD) are serious public health problems worldwide. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the neurobiology of drug reward and the transition to addiction, effective pharmacotherapies for SUD remain limited and a majority of drug users relapse even after a period of treatment. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several medications for opioid, nicotine, and alcohol use disorders, whereas none are approved for the treatment of cocaine or other psychostimulant use disorders. The medications approved by the FDA for the treatment of SUD can be divided into two major classes - agonist replacement therapies, such as methadone and buprenorphine for opioid use disorders (OUD), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and varenicline for nicotine use disorders (NUD), and antagonist therapies, such as naloxone for opioid overdose and naltrexone for promoting abstinence. In the present review, we primarily focus on the pharmacological rationale of agonist replacement strategies in treatment of opioid dependence, and the potential translation of this rationale to new therapies for cocaine use disorders. We begin by describing the neural mechanisms underlying opioid reward, followed by preclinical and clinical findings supporting the utility of agonist therapies in the treatment of OUD. We then discuss recent progress of agonist therapies for cocaine use disorders based on lessons learned from methadone and buprenorphine. We contend that future studies should identify agonist pharmacotherapies that can facilitate abstinence in patients who are motivated to quit their illicit drug use. Focusing on those that are able to achieve abstinence from cocaine will provide a platform to broaden the effectiveness of medication and psychosocial treatment strategies for this underserved population. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'New Vistas in Opioid Pharmacology'.

Keywords: Addiction; Agonist replacement therapy; Atypical dopamine uptake inhibitor; Cocaine; Dopamine transporter; Methadone; Opioids; Substance use disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
A summary diagram illustrating the mesolimbic DA reward system, and targets of heroin, nicotine, cocaine, and compounds used as agonist therapies for the treatment of substance use disorder.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Characterization of the neurochemical and behavioral effects of heroin and methadone in vivo in rats. A, B: Systemic administration of heroin or methadone produced significant and dose-dependent increases in extracellular NAc DA, with methadone displaying a longer-duration of action than heroin. C, D: Systemic administration of heroin or methadone dose-dependently increased open-field locomotor activity. Again, methadone displays a long-acting profile. E, F: Systemic administration of heroin produced a dose-dependent increase in intracranial brain-stimulation reward (BSR) maintained by electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle of the hypothalamus, while methadone produced a modest increase in BSR only at 3 mg/kg. G, H: Heroin priming induced robust reinstatement of heroin-seeking behavior in rats extinguished from previous heroin self-administration, while methadone did not induce reinstatement at either dose tested. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared to baseline before heroin or methadone injection or compared to vehicle control group. (Some data are replotted from Peng et al., 2010).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Methadone pretreatment attenuates heroin action in animal models of addiction. A: Effects of methadone pretreatment on heroin-induced increase extracellular NAc DA; B: Heroin-induced increases in extracellular DA are blocked by methadone pretreatment (data highlighted in gray were normalized over the baseline before heroin injection); C: Methadone dose-dependently attenuated heroin-enhanced BSR; D: Methadone, at 5 mg/kg, attenuated heroin-enhanced BSR produced by multiple heroin doses; E: Methadone inhibited intravenous heroin self-administration in rats in a dose-dependent manner; F: Methadone, administered 30 min prior to heroin, dose-dependently attenuated 0.25 mg/kg heroin-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, compared to vehicle control group. (Some data are replotted from Peng et al., 2010).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agoston GE, Wu JH, Izenwasser S, George C, Katz J, et al. 1997. Novel N-substituted 3 alpha-[bis(4’-fluorophenyl)methoxy]tropane analogues: selective ligands for the dopamine transporter. J Med Chem 40: 4329–39. - PubMed
    1. Al-Hasani R, Bruchas MR. 2011. Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. Anesthesiology 115: 1363–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali S, Tahir B, Jabeen S, Malik M. 2017. Methadone Treatment of Opiate Addiction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Innov Clin Neurosci 14: 8–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amato L, Davoli M, Minozzi S, Ferroni E, Ali R, Ferri M. 2013. Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson AL, Li SH, Biswas K, McSherry F, Holmes T, et al. 2012. Modafinil for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 120: 135–41. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms