Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 15;14(1):30-36.
doi: 10.5009/gnl18491.

Detecting Early Pancreatic Cancer: Current Problems and Future Prospects

Affiliations
Review

Detecting Early Pancreatic Cancer: Current Problems and Future Prospects

Hiroyuki Matsubayashi et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

The number of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is currently increasing in both Korea and Japan. The 5-year survival rate of patients with PC 13.0%; however, resection with minimal invasion (tumor size: ≤10 mm) increases the 5-year survival rate to 80%. For this reason, early detection is essential, but most patients with early-stage PC are asymptomatic. Early detection of PC has been reported to require screening of high-risk individuals (HRIs), such as those with a family history of PC, inherited cancer syndromes, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, or chronic pancreatitis. Studies on screening of these HRIs have confirmed a significantly better prognosis among patients with PC who were screened than for patients with PC who were not screened. However, to date in Japan, most patients with early-stage PC diagnosed in routine clinics were not diagnosed during annual health checks or by surveillance; rather, PC was detected in these patients by incidental findings during examinations for other diseases. We need to increase the precision of the PC screening and diagnostic processes by introducing new technologies, and we need to pay greater attention to incidental clinical findings.

Keywords: Early detection of cancer; Incidental finding; Mass screening; Pancreatic neoplasms; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm of the diagnosis and treatment of early pancreatic cancer. US, ultrasonography; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; EUS-FNA, endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ENPD, endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H, et al. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th year anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2012;41:985–992. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318258055c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanno A, Masamune A, Hanada K, et al. Multicenter study of early pancreatic cancer in Japan. Pancreatology. 2018;18:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanno S, Nakano Y, Koizumi K, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in long-term follow-up patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Pancreas. 2010;39:36–40. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181b91cd0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choi SH, Park SH, Kim KW, Lee JY, Lee SS. Progression of unresected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas to cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1509–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crippa S, Capurso G, Cammà C, Fave GD, Castillo CF, Falconi M. Risk of pancreatic malignancy and mortality in branch-duct IPMNs undergoing surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.003. - DOI - PubMed