Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the CSF Amyloid β (Aβ) 42/40 ratio in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
- PMID: 31010420
- PMCID: PMC6477717
- DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0
Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the CSF Amyloid β (Aβ) 42/40 ratio in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biochemical markers (biomarkers) Amyloidβ 42 (Aβ42), total Tau (T-tau) and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau181) have proven diagnostic accuracy for mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD). In an effort to improve the accuracy of an AD diagnosis, it is important to be able to distinguish between AD and other types of dementia (non-AD). The concentration ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40 (Aβ42/40 Ratio) has been suggested to be superior to the concentration of Aβ42 alone when identifying patients with AD. This article reviews the available evidence on the use of the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio in the diagnosis of AD. Based on the body of evidence presented herein, it is the conclusion of the current working group that the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio, rather than the absolute value of CSF Aβ42, should be used when analysing CSF AD biomarkers to improve the percentage of appropriately diagnosed patients.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s Disease; Amyloidβ Peptides; Aβ42/40 ratio; Biomarkers; Cerebrospinal Fluid.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All authors have received consultation honoraria from Fujirebio Europe. PL has received honoraria for consultations and/or lectures from Fujirebio, IBL International, AJ Roboscreen and Roche. In the past 2 years, OH has received consultancy/speaker fees (paid to the institution) from Lilly and Roche. HZ has served on scientific advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Roche Diagnostics, Samumed, CogRx and Wave.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- Peskind ER, Riekse R, Quinn JF, et al. Safety and acceptability of the research lumbar puncture. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2005;19(4):220–225. - PubMed
-
- Lewczuk Piotr, Riederer Peter, O’Bryant Sid E., Verbeek Marcel M., Dubois Bruno, Visser Pieter Jelle, Jellinger Kurt A., Engelborghs Sebastiaan, Ramirez Alfredo, Parnetti Lucilla, Jack Clifford R., Teunissen Charlotte E., Hampel Harald, Lleó Alberto, Jessen Frank, Glodzik Lidia, de Leon Mony J., Fagan Anne M., Molinuevo José Luis, Jansen Willemijn J., Winblad Bengt, Shaw Leslie M., Andreasson Ulf, Otto Markus, Mollenhauer Brit, Wiltfang Jens, Turner Martin R., Zerr Inga, Handels Ron, Thompson Alexander G., Johansson Gunilla, Ermann Natalia, Trojanowski John Q., Karaca Ilker, Wagner Holger, Oeckl Patrick, van Waalwijk van Doorn Linda, Bjerke Maria, Kapogiannis Dimitrios, Kuiperij H. Bea, Farotti Lucia, Li Yi, Gordon Brian A., Epelbaum Stéphane, Vos Stephanie J. B., Klijn Catharina J. M., Van Nostrand William E., Minguillon Carolina, Schmitz Matthias, Gallo Carla, Lopez Mato Andrea, Thibaut Florence, Lista Simone, Alcolea Daniel, Zetterberg Henrik, Blennow Kaj, Kornhuber Johannes. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2017;19(4):244–328. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical