Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 28;3(3):55.
doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3030055.

Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fracture Care in the UK: Factors Driving Change to More Integrated Models of Care

Affiliations
Review

Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fracture Care in the UK: Factors Driving Change to More Integrated Models of Care

Mark Middleton. Geriatrics (Basel). .

Abstract

In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 80,000 hip fractures each year result in an estimated annual cost of two billion pounds in direct healthcare costs alone. Various models of care exist for collaboration between orthopaedic surgeons and geriatricians in response to the complex medical, rehabilitation, and social needs of this patient group. Mounting evidence suggests that more integrated models of orthogeriatric care result in superior quality of care indicators and clinical outcomes. Clinical governance through national guidelines, audit through the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), and financial incentives through the Best Practice Tariff (providing a £1335 bonus for each patient) have driven hip fracture care in the UK forward. The demanded improvement in quality indicators has increased the popularity of collaborative care models and particularly integrated orthogeriatric services. A significant fall in 30-day mortality has resulted nationally. Ongoing data collection by the NHFD will lead to greater understanding of the impact of all elements of hip fracture care including models of orthogeriatrics.

Keywords: geriatric care models; hip fracture; national hip fracture database; orthogeriatric care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Cooper C., Campion G., Melton L.J., 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection. Osteoporos. Int. 1992;2:285–289. doi: 10.1007/BF01623184. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leung F., Blauth M., Bavonratanavech S. Surgery for fragility hip fracture—Streamlining the process. Osteoporos. Int. 2010;21:519–521. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1402-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker P.N., Salar O., Ollivere B.J., Weerasuriya N., Moppett I.K., Moran C.G. Evolution of the hip fracture population: Time to consider the future? A retrospective observational analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004405. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004405. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irvine R.E., Devas M.B. The geriatric orthopaedic unit. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1963;49:186–187.
    1. NICE Guidelines (CG124) The Management of Hip Fracture in Adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; London, UK: 2011.

LinkOut - more resources