The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli
- PMID: 3101110
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00174076
The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli
Abstract
Rats were trained to discriminate between two compound stimulus arrays that included exteroceptive (ES) and interoceptive (IS) stimulus components. The ES components were illumination and tactile cues, and the IS components were produced by d-amphetamine (A) or Na pentobarbital (P) treatment (drug versus drug discrimination). The relative ES-IS strength was then determined by testing with "mismatched" stimulus arrays consisting of combinations of ES and IS components that had not been presented simultaneously during training. Additional tests were done with ES only (no drug treatments). At training doses of 0.8 mg/kg A versus 10 mg/kg P, the ES were less salient than, but did share stimulus control with, the stronger IS components. In a second group, trained with lower doses (0.5 mg/kg A versus 4 mg/kg P), the ES were much more salient than the IS, although again, both types of stimuli did acquire some control. This dose-related sharing of stimulus control between ES and IS components is similar to relationships among components of compound arrays consisting entirely of ES, and thus further illustrates similarity between drug-produced and exteroceptive stimuli.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of interoceptive and exteroceptive discrimination in the pigeon.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Nov;34(3):641-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90570-4. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989. PMID: 2623020
-
The effect of d-amphetamine on performance on two operant timing schedules.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Jun;150(2):170-84. doi: 10.1007/s002130000422. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000. PMID: 10907670
-
Configurations of the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol and nicotine with two different exteroceptive contexts in rats: Extinction & recovery.Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 17. Behav Processes. 2015. PMID: 25895858
-
Assessment of drug state dimensionality via drug-drug training and stimulus generalization testing.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Nov;21(5):687-93. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80003-9. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984. PMID: 6096894
-
Drug discrimination learning: Interoceptive stimulus control of behavior and its implications for regulated and dysregulated drug intake.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Nov;244:173848. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173848. Epub 2024 Aug 11. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024. PMID: 39137873 Review.
Cited by
-
Inhaled toluene vapor as a discriminative stimulus.Behav Pharmacol. 2007 May;18(3):219-29. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328157f460. Behav Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17426486 Free PMC article.
-
Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.Addict Biol. 2011 Jan;16(1):152-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00228.x. Addict Biol. 2011. PMID: 20579006 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of drug-paired exteroceptive stimulus presentations on methamphetamine reinstatement in rats.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008 Sep;90(3):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.03.028. Epub 2008 Apr 4. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008. PMID: 18456312 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00442000. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989. PMID: 2498952 No abstract available.
-
Excitatory conditioning to the interoceptive nicotine stimulus blocks subsequent conditioning to an exteroceptive light stimulus.Behav Brain Res. 2011 Aug 1;221(1):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Behav Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21419807 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources