Shared responsibility in collective decisions
- PMID: 31011162
- PMCID: PMC6570616
- DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0596-4
Shared responsibility in collective decisions
Abstract
Research investigating collective decision-making has focused primarily on the improvement of accuracy in collective decisions and less on the motives that drive individuals to make these decisions. We argue that a strong but neglected motive for making collective decisions is minimizing the material and psychological burden of an individual's responsibility. Making difficult decisions with others shields individuals from the consequences of negative outcomes by reducing regret, punishment and stress. Considering shared responsibility as a another key motivation to join groups helps understand behaviours with societal implications such as political voting, committing norm violations, predicting natural disasters and making health-related decisions.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

References
-
- Kameda T, Wisdom T, Toyokawa W, Inukai K. Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2012;15:673–689.
-
- Sumpter D, Krause J, James R, Couzin ID, Ward A. Consensus Decision Making by Fish. Curr Biol. 2008;22:1773–1777. - PubMed
-
- Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. Abacus. 2005
-
- Sunstein CR, Hastie R. Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter. Harvard Business Press; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources