Procreative consciousness in a global market: gay men's paths to surrogacy in the USA
- PMID: 31011637
- PMCID: PMC6465560
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.03.001
Procreative consciousness in a global market: gay men's paths to surrogacy in the USA
Abstract
This article explores one of the contemporary contexts of reproductive decision-making: gay men's paths to surrogacy within the globalised USA fertility industry. The stories collected from qualitative interviews and ethnographic research with 37 gay men from several countries in Europe and the USA, who all had children through surrogacy in the USA, show that the men's understandings of their own reproductive aspirations and opportunities changed over time, as if recovering the fertility that was lost by coming out. This shift in the men's procreative consciousness - i.e. in their awareness of being subjects that could reproduce (or not) - disrupts the heteronormative idea that to be queer is not to contribute to the reproduction of the species, the family and the nation. Alongside this consciousness shift, however, reproductive decision-making of the gay men in this study was contingent on multiple factors: access to the fertility industry; economics, given how expensive and thus stratified surrogacy is; social support in the men's communities and extended families; their emotions and values. Therefore these gay men's reproductive decision-making could be characterized in terms of reproductive contingency and consciousness change, within which the globalised fertility industry was one relevant element among the choreography of multiple factors. These findings evidence that despite naturalization of reproduction as an obvious or 'natural' event in life, it is contingent, anything but obvious, and its perceptions are changeable. Reproduction is achieved not merely as a result of rational decision-making but rather in the interplay with an array of factors.
Keywords: LGBTQ reproduction; fertility industry; gay fathers; procreative consciousness; reproductive decision-making; surrogacy.
Similar articles
-
A limited market: the recruitment of gay men as surrogacy clients by the infertility industry in the USA.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 18;7:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.019. eCollection 2018 Nov. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 30555951 Free PMC article.
-
Rights-holders or refugees? Do gay men need reproductive justice?Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Aug 16;7:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.07.001. eCollection 2018 Nov. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 31061902 Free PMC article.
-
Bargaining With 'Reproductive Capital': Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy.Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Mar;47(3):e70019. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70019. Sociol Health Illn. 2025. PMID: 40119712
-
Men's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to fertility.Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Jul 1;23(4):458-480. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx005. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28333354 Review.
-
Marginalization among the marginalized: gay men's anti-effeminacy attitudes.J Homosex. 2001;42(1):1-28. doi: 10.1300/j082v42n01_01. J Homosex. 2001. PMID: 11991561 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual identities and reproductive orientations: Coming out as wanting (or not wanting) to have children.Sexualities. 2021 Feb;24(1-2):276-294. doi: 10.1177/1363460720926967. Epub 2020 Jun 11. Sexualities. 2021. PMID: 33343222 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: Who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Oct 14;11:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003. eCollection 2020 Nov. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020. PMID: 33204864 Free PMC article.
-
Discussing parenthood with gay men diagnosed with HIV: a qualitative study of patient and healthcare practitioner perspectives.BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 19;21(1):2300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12285-4. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34923967 Free PMC article.
-
Birth includes us: Development of a community-led survey to capture experiences of pregnancy care among LGBTQ2S+ families.Birth. 2023 Mar;50(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/birt.12704. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Birth. 2023. PMID: 36625538 Free PMC article.
-
Unpacking categorizations in researching GBTIQ+ parents.Sexualities. 2025 Mar;28(3):994-1010. doi: 10.1177/13634607241228113. Epub 2024 Jan 16. Sexualities. 2025. PMID: 40255518 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alvarez Bruna. Reproductive decision making in Spain: Heterosexual couples' narratives about how they choose to have children. J. Fam. Issues. 2018;39(13):3487–3507. (https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192513X18783494)
-
- Baldwin Kylie. 'I suppose I think to myself, that's the best way to be a mother': How ideologies of parenthood shape women's use for social egg freezing technology. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), p.2:DOI: 10.5153/sro.4187. In: Faircloth Charlotte, Gurtin Zeynep., editors. Making parents: Reproductive technologies and parenting culture across borders. 22(2) 2017. p. 2. (Special Issue of Sociological Research Online).
-
- Bartholomaeus Clare, Riggs Damien.W. Intending fathers: Heterosexual men planning for a first child. J. Fam. Stud. 2017;0:1–15.
-
- Berend Zsuzsa. Berghahn; New York & Oxford: 2016. The Online World of Surrogacy.
-
- Berkowitz Dana. A sociohistorical analysis of gay men's procreative consciousness. J. GLBT Fam. Stud. 2007;3(2–3):157–190.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources