Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;33(1):191-203.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00216-0.

A Region-Based Deep Level Set Formulation for Vertebral Bone Segmentation of Osteoporotic Fractures

Affiliations

A Region-Based Deep Level Set Formulation for Vertebral Bone Segmentation of Osteoporotic Fractures

Faisal Rehman et al. J Digit Imaging. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of the vertebrae from medical images plays an important role in computer-aided diagnoses (CADs). It provides an initial and early diagnosis of various vertebral abnormalities to doctors and radiologists. Vertebrae segmentation is very important but difficult task in medical imaging due to low-contrast imaging and noise. It becomes more challenging when dealing with fractured (osteoporotic) cases. This work is dedicated to address the challenging problem of vertebra segmentation. In the past, various segmentation techniques of vertebrae have been proposed. Recently, deep learning techniques have been introduced in biomedical image processing for segmentation and characterization of several abnormalities. These techniques are becoming popular for segmentation purposes due to their robustness and accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel combination of traditional region-based level set with deep learning framework in order to predict shape of vertebral bones accurately; thus, it would be able to handle the fractured cases efficiently. We termed this novel Framework as "FU-Net" which is a powerful and practical framework to handle fractured vertebrae segmentation efficiently. The proposed method was successfully evaluated on two different challenging datasets: (1) 20 CT scans, 15 healthy cases, and 5 fractured cases provided at spine segmentation challenge CSI 2014; (2) 25 CT image data (both healthy and fractured cases) provided at spine segmentation challenge CSI 2016 or xVertSeg.v1 challenge. We have achieved promising results on our proposed technique especially on fractured cases. Dice score was found to be 96.4 ± 0.8% without fractured cases and 92.8 ± 1.9% with fractured cases in CSI 2014 dataset (lumber and thoracic). Similarly, dice score was 95.2 ± 1.9% on 15 CT dataset (with given ground truths) and 95.4 ± 2.1% on total 25 CT dataset for CSI 2016 datasets (with 10 annotated CT datasets). The proposed technique outperformed other state-of-the-art techniques and handled the fractured cases for the first time efficiently.

Keywords: Computer-aided diagnosis; Deep learning; Medical image analysis; Vertebrae segmentation; Vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Human vertebral column
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are shown in a and b with arrows
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Statistics of death cases with osteoporotic fractures in year 2010 on around 30 European countries data
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
WHO estimated statistics of osteoporotic fractured cases
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
System diagram of FU-Net
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
U-Net architecture. a Segmentation network architecture. b Labels
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Examples of datasets. a CSI 2014 Data Set. b CSI 2014 Dataset with fractured bone. c CSI 2016 Dataset with fractures
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Segmentation results of our proposed system (a, b). Results of CSI 2014 CT dataset. c Result from fractured case from CSI 2014 dataset (cropped for better visualization); arrow shows the fractured bone. d Result of xVertSeg.v1 dataset. e Result of fractured case of xVertSeg.v1 dataset with arrow, pointing the fractured bones
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Box and whisker plot on evaluation set of CSI 2014 dataset (including fractured cases)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Mean dice score evaluation on various combinations of training data

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levangie PK, Norkin CC: Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis, 5th edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co, p. 140 Print 2011
    1. Middleditch A, Olive J. 2nd. Oxford: MCSP. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005. Functional anatomy of the spine.
    1. Tang F-h, et al. Computer-generated index for evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis in digital chest images, a comparison with digital measurement. J Digit Imaging. 2007;21:113–120. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9050-7.. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Liu Y, Chen Q, Gu G, Sui X: Automatic lumbar MRI detection and identification based on deep learning. J Digit Imaging, Springer, 2018. 10.1007/s10278-018-0130-7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang KC, Jeanmenne A, Weber GM, Thawait S, Carrino JA. An online evidence-based decision support system for distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures by magnetic resonance imaging feature analysis. J Digit Imaging. 2010;24(3):507–515. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9316-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms