Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting: An Integrative Psychological Pain Response Model
- PMID: 31011992
- PMCID: PMC8240838
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-1422-9
Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting: An Integrative Psychological Pain Response Model
Abstract
The World Health Organization estimates that over 200 million women and girls have experienced female genital cutting (FGC). Many women and girls who have undergone FGC have migrated to areas of the world where providers are unfamiliar with the health needs associated with FGC. Both providers in Western healthcare systems and female immigrant and refugee patients report communication difficulties leading to distrust of providers by women who have experienced FGC. Sexual pain is one common problem requiring discussion with healthcare providers and possible intervention. Yet, existing clinical and research literature provides little guidance for assessment and intervention when sexual pain is a result of FGC. Several conceptual frameworks have been developed to conceptualize and guide treatments for other types of pain, such as back pain and headaches. In this article, we integrate four prominent models-the fear avoidance model, eustress endurance model, distress endurance model, and pain resilience model-to conceptualize sexual pain in women who have experienced FGC. The resulting integrative psychological pain response model will aid in providing culturally responsive clinical management of sexual pain to women who have experienced FGC. This integrative model also provides a theoretical foundation for future research in this population.
Keywords: Female genital cutting; Immigrant women’s health; Pain models; Refugee women’s health; Sexual pain.
© 2019. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Importance of Interpersonal Context When Conceptualizing Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1887-1890. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01523-x. Epub 2019 Aug 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 31372793 No abstract available.
-
Resilience in Women's Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting: Adaptation Across Time and Personal and Cultural Context.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1891-1895. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01536-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 31482425 No abstract available.
-
Seeking a Deeper Understanding of the Underlying Causes of Sexual Pain in Women Who Have Undergone Female Genital Cutting.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1897-1901. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01555-3. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 31559521 No abstract available.
-
Protecting Children from Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting Without Stigmatizing Women's Bodies: Implications for Sexual Pleasure and Pain.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1875-1885. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01633-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 31965452 No abstract available.
-
Conceptualizing Sexual Pain in Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1871-1874. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01691-1. Epub 2020 Apr 11. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 32279168 No abstract available.
-
Risk, Harm, and Prevention of Female Genital Cutting in the U.S.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1903-1906. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01679-x. Epub 2020 Apr 15. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 32297097 No abstract available.
-
Response to Commentaries: Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1907-1912. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02047-z. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34100144 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Andro A, & Lesclingand M (2016). Les mutilations génitales féminines (Grieve M & Reeve P, Trans.). État des lieux et des connaissances. [Female genital mutilation. Overview and current knowledge]. Population, 71, 217–296. 10.3917/popu.1602.0224. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical