Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;43(3):575-590.
doi: 10.1111/disa.12344. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions within a humanitarian organisation

Chloe Puett  1
Affiliations

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions within a humanitarian organisation

Chloe Puett. Disasters. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis is increasingly relevant in humanitarian action. The cost of response has increased exponentially in the past decade, alongside concurrent donor budget restrictions. However, there remains limited comprehension and application of these methods in this field. This paper documents methods developed for use within Action Against Hunger, an international humanitarian organisation, in response to a lack of understanding of this topic within the humanitarian community and limited evidence of the cost-effectiveness of humanitarian action. These methods encompass costs to both implementing institutions and participating communities. Activity-based cost analyses are conducted to assess resources per programme activity. Cost-effectiveness is evaluated using successful programme outcomes, and uncertainty is appraised via sensitivity analysis. This paper aims to advance knowledge, stimulate discussion, and promote the adoption of cost-effectiveness methods for building the evidence base for humanitarian action, including consideration of community costs, to enable analytical outputs that are useful for managers and policymakers alike.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; humanitarian interventions; value for money.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alderman, H. , Behrman J.R., and Puett C. (2017) ‘Big numbers about small children: estimating the economic benefits of addressing undernutrition’. The World Bank Research Observer. 32(1). pp. 107–125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashworth, A. and Khanum S. (1997) ‘Cost‐effective treatment for severely malnourished children: what is the best approach?’. Health Policy and Planning. 12(2). pp. 115–121. - PubMed
    1. Ayieko, P. , Akumu A., Griffiths U., and English M. (2009) ‘The economic burden of inpatient paediatric care in Kenya: household and provider costs for treatment of pneumonia, malaria and meningitis’. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 7(3). 10.1186/1478-7547-7-3 (last accessed on 8 February 2019). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachmann, M.O. (2009) ‘Cost effectiveness of community‐based therapeutic care for children with severe acute malnutrition in Zambia: decision tree model’. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 7(2). 10.1186/1478-7547-7-2 (last accessed on 8 February 2019). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulti, A. , Chitekwe S., Puett C., and Myatt M. (2015) ‘How many lives do our CMAM programs save? A sampling‐based approach to estimating the number of deaths averted by the Nigerian CMAM program’. Field Exchange. 50 (August). pp. 38–45.