Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0198979.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198979. eCollection 2019.

Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings

Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena  1 , Gudlavalleti Venkata S Murthy  1 , Jennifer L Y Yip  1 , Clare Gilbert  1 , Maria Zuurmond  2 , Tunde Peto  3 , Iris Gordon  1 , Suwin Hewage  4 , Sureshkumar Kamalakannan  5
Affiliations

Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings

Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) can lead to visual impairment and blindness if not detected and treated in time. Knowing the barriers/enablers in advance in contrasting different country income settings may accelerate development of a successful DR screening (DRS) program. This would be especially applicable in the low-income settings with the rising prevalence of DR.

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to identify and contrast the barriers/enablers to DRS for different contexts using both consumers i.e., people with diabetes (PwDM) and provider perspectives and system level factors in different country income settings.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library from the databases start date to December 2018. We included the studies reported on barriers and enablers to access DRS services based at health care facilities. We categorised and synthesized themes related to the consumers (individuals), providers and the health systems (environment) as main dimensions according to the constructs of social cognitive theory, supported by the quantitative measures i.e., odds ratios as reported by each of the study authors.

Main results: We included 77 studies primarily describing the barriers and enablers. Most of the studies were from high income settings (72.7%, 56/77) and cross sectional in design (76.6%, 59/77). From the perspectives of consumers, lack of knowledge, attitude, awareness and motivation were identified as major barriers. The enablers were fear of blindness, proximity of screening facility, experiences of vision loss and being concerned of eye complications. In providers' perspectives, lack of skilled human resources, training programs, infrastructure of retinal imaging and cost of services were the main barriers. Higher odds of uptake of DRS services was observed when PwDM were provided health education (odds ratio (OR) 4.3) and having knowledge on DR (OR range 1.3-19.7).

Conclusion: Knowing the barriers to access DRS is a pre-requisite in development of a successful screening program. The awareness, knowledge and attitude of the consumers, availability of skilled human resources and infrastructure emerged as the major barriers to access to DRS in any income setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Harvest plot showing user barriers.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Harvest plot showing user incentives.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Harvest plot showing provider barriers.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Harvest plot showing provider incentives.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation—Diabetes Atlas Eighth Edition 2017 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html. Cited 15 January 2018.
    1. Hall M, Felton A. The St Vincent Declaration 20 years on—defeating diabetes in the 21st century. Primary Care Diabetes. 2009;3(2):127–128. 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.06.003 - DOI
    1. Klein R, Klein BEK. The Epidemiology of Diabetic Retinopathy [Internet]. Fifth Edit Vols. 2–3, Retina: Fourth Edition. Elsevier Inc.; 2005. 1503–1521 p. Available from: 10.1016/B978-1-4557-0737-9.00045-X. Cited 15 Aug 2017. - DOI
    1. Fernandes De R.J, Ogurtsova K, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Seuring T, Zhang P, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas estimates of 2014 global health expenditures on diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016; 117:48–54. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Penchansky R, Thomas J. The concept of access-Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care. Med Care. 1981;19(2):127–40. - PubMed

Publication types