Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 22;7(4):93.
doi: 10.3390/sports7040093.

Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit® Performance

Joshua D Dexheimer  1   2 , E Todd Schroeder  3 , Brandon J Sawyer  4 , Robert W Pettitt  5 , Arnel L Aguinaldo  6 , William A Torrence  7
Affiliations

Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit® Performance

Joshua D Dexheimer et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

CrossFit® began as another exercise program to improve physical fitness and has rapidly grown into the "sport of fitness". However, little is understood as to the physiological indicators that determine CrossFit® sport performance. The purpose of this study was to determine which physiological performance measure was the greatest indicator of CrossFit® workout performance. Male (n = 12) and female (n = 5) participants successfully completed a treadmill graded exercise test to measure maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), a 3-minute all-out running test (3MT) to determine critical speed (CS) and the finite capacity for running speeds above CS (D'), a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) to assess anaerobic peak and mean power, the CrossFit® total to measure total body strength, as well as the CrossFit® benchmark workouts: Fran, Grace, and Nancy. It was hypothesized that CS and total body strength would be the greatest indicators of CrossFit® performance. Pearson's r correlations were used to determine the relationship of benchmark performance data and the physiological performance measures. For each benchmark-dependent variable, a stepwise linear regression was created using significant correlative data. For the workout Fran, back squat strength explained 42% of the variance. VO2max explained 68% of the variance for the workout Nancy. Lastly, anaerobic peak power explained 57% of the variance for performance on the CrossFit® total. In conclusion, results demonstrated select physiological performance variables may be used to predict CrossFit® workout performance.

Keywords: CrossFit® sport performance; D′; VO2max; benchmark performance; critical speed; physiological indicators; strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plots of the relationship between back squat strength and Fran time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots of the relationship between VO2max and Nancy times.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plots of the relationship between anaerobic peak power and CrossFit® total weight lifted.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. CrossFit® About the Games. [(accessed on 23 January 2018)]; Available online: https://games.crossfit.com/about-the-games.
    1. Glassman G. Understanding Crossfit. Crossfit J. 2007;56:1.
    1. Feito Y., Heinrich K., Butcher S., Poston W. High-intensity functional training (HIFT): Definition and research implications for improved fitness. Sports. 2018;6:76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paine J., Uptgraft J., Wylie R. CrossFit study. Commond Gen. Staff Coll. 2010;1:1–34.
    1. Murawska-Cialowicz E., Wojna J., Zuwala-Jagiello J. Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015;66:811–821. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources