Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):377.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5601-9.

Smoking status and subsequent gastric cancer risk in men compared with women: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Smoking status and subsequent gastric cancer risk in men compared with women: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

Wen-Ya Li et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Smoking is one of the well-established risk factors for gastric cancer incidence, yet whether men are more or equally susceptible to gastric cancer due to smoking compared with women is a matter of controversy. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of sex on gastric cancer risk associated with smoking.

Methods: We conducted a systemic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases to identify studies published from inception to December 2018. We included prospective observational studies which reported effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of current or former smokers with the incidence of gastric cancer by sex. We calculated the ratio of relative risk (RRR) with corresponding 95% CI based on sex-specific effect estimates for current or former smokers versus non-smokers on the risk of gastric cancer.

Results: We included 10 prospective studies with 3,381,345 participants in our analysis. Overall, the summary RRR (male to female) for gastric cancer risk in current smokers was significantly increased compared with non-smokers (RRR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.05-1.63; P = 0.019). Furthermore, there was no significant sex difference for the association between former smokers and gastric cancer risk (RRR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.92-1.55; P = 0.178). However, the result of sensitivity analysis indicated the pooled result was not stable, which was altered by excluding a nested case-control study (RRR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10-1.57; P = 0.002).

Conclusion: This systematic review showed a potential sex difference association between current smokers and the risk of gastric cancer. The sex differential in smokers can give important clues for the etiology of gastric cancers and should be examined in further studies.

Keywords: Cancer risk; Gastric cancer; Meta-analysis; Sex; Smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the literature search and trial selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The associations of current smokers with the risk of gastric cancer in men and women separately
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sex difference of the association between current smokers and the risk of gastric cancer
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The associations of former smokers with the risk of gastric cancer in men and women separately
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Sex difference of the association between former smoker and the risk of gastric cancer
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plots for current smokers versus non-smokers
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Funnel plots for former smokers versus non-smokers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2018. 10.1002/ijc.31937. - PubMed
    1. Bae JM, Kim EH. Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of gastric Cancer in Korea: a quantitative systematic review. J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49:197–204. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deng W, Yang H, Wang J, et al. Coffee consumption and the risk of incident gastric cancer--a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Cancer. 2016;68:40–47. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1115093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Y, Lin LJ, Sang LX, et al. Dairy product consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15879–15898. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15879. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types