Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):236.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4043-z.

Primary care provider perceptions and experiences of implementing hepatitis C virus birth cohort testing: a qualitative formative evaluation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Primary care provider perceptions and experiences of implementing hepatitis C virus birth cohort testing: a qualitative formative evaluation

Vera Yakovchenko et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In 2014, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adopted a screening test policy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in all "Baby Boomers" - those born between 1945 and 1965. About 1 in 12 Veterans were estimated to be infected with HCV yet approximately 34% of the birth cohort remained untested. Early HCV diagnosis and successful antiviral treatment decrease the risk of onward transmission, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and death. Implementing evidence-based HCV screening in primary care has great potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. To inform design and implementation of a quality improvement intervention, we studied primary care provider (PCP) perceptions of and experiences with HCV birth cohort testing.

Methods: We conducted a formative evaluation using qualitative semi-structured interviews guided by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework. Twenty-two PCPs in six states across a large integrated US healthcare system were interviewed. Content analysis with a priori and emergent codes was performed on verbatim interview transcripts.

Results: We identified three themes related to primary care provider HCV testing and linkage practices, as mapped to i-PARIHS constructs: 1) evaluating cues to HCV testing (innovation/evidence), 2) framing HCV testing decisions (recipients), and 3) HCV testing and linkage to care in the new treatment era (context). The most frequently reported HCV testing cue was an electronic clinical reminder alert, followed by clinical markers and the presence of behavioral risk factors. Most PCPs saw testing as routine, but less urgent, leading to some reluctance. Providers largely saw themselves as performing guideline-concordant testing, yet no performance data were available to assess performance. Given the recent availability of new HCV medications, many PCPs were highly motivated to test and link patients to specialty care for treatment.

Conclusions: Our results suggest a multi-component intervention around awareness and education, feedback of performance data, clinical reminder updates, and leadership support, would address both a significant need, and be deemed acceptable and feasible to primary care providers.

Keywords: Guidelines; Hepatitis C; Infectious diseases; Primary care; Screening; Testing; Veterans health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. In accordance with IRB guidelines, verbal consent was obtained from each participant prior to being interviewed and all personal identifiers were removed to ensure participant anonymity.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No conflict of interest, financial or other, exists for any of the authors of this manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edlin BR, Eckhardt BJ, Shu MA, Holmberg SD, Swan T. Toward a more accurate estimate of the prevalence of hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology. 2015;62(5):1353–1363. doi: 10.1002/hep.27978. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross DB, Belperio PS, Chartier M, Backus LI. Hepatitis C testing in U.S. veterans born 1945-1965: An update. J Hepatol. 2017;66(1):237–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.09.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Backus LI, Belperio PS, Shahoumian TA, Mole LA. Impact of Sustained Virologic Response with Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment on Mortality in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease. Hepatology. 2017. 10.1002/hep.29408 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - PubMed
    1. Committee on a National Strategy for the Elimination of Hepatitis B and C; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences E. Eliminating the Public Health Problem of Hepatitis B and C in the United States: Phase One Report. In: Buckley GJ, Strom BL, eds. Washington (DC), 2016. - PubMed
    1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources