Are Austrian practitioners ready to use medical apps? Results of a validation study
- PMID: 31014333
- PMCID: PMC6480835
- DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0811-2
Are Austrian practitioners ready to use medical apps? Results of a validation study
Abstract
Background: As part of the mobile revolution, smartphone-based applications (apps) have become almost indispensable in today's information society. Consequently, the use of medical apps among healthcare professionals has increased heavily over the past years. As little is known on medical app use in day-to-day clinical practice in Austria, the present study aims at closing this knowledge gap by assessing respective prevalence, readiness, and concerns among Austrian practitioners.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among a sample of 151 Austrian doctors (mean age 45.0, SD 12.0, 55.0% females). We developed a German study questionnaire on the basis of the Practitioner Telehealth Readiness Assessment Tool (PRAT) to assess medical app use-related readiness and attitudes, and validated it using principal component analysis.
Results: In our study, 74% of participants used medical apps on a daily basis, with clarity, ease of use, speed, and support in clinical routine mentioned as most important app features. However, the majority of participants perceived certain barriers to use medical apps. Younger participants used more medical apps, were more likely to use them during work, and yielded higher readiness scores. The most often used medical apps were Diagnosia and Embryotox (both 28.5%).
Conclusions: Nowadays, medical apps serve as an important source of information for many doctors and are especially popular among younger physicians. The omnipresence of smartphones in the smocks of healthcare workers raised awareness for potential shortcomings regarding disruption of traditional face-to-face doctor-patient interaction among all healthcare stakeholders. This study's finding thus highlight the need for initiating a public discussion on legal and social frameworks to successfully integrate mobile apps into everyday clinical.
Keywords: Health communication; Healthcare personnel; Medical technologies; Principal components analysis; Telemedicine; mHealth.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This survey was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, (matriculation number no. 1633977) on 21 December 2017 and conducted following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation was anonymous and voluntary, thus study subjects gave their implicit consent when starting the online survey.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Does gender matter? Exploring perceptions regarding health technologies among employees and students at a medical university.Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103948. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Int J Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31442846
-
Digital age and the Public eHealth perspective: Prevailing health app use among Austrian Internet users.Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Dec;43(4):390-400. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1399131. Epub 2017 Dec 19. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018. PMID: 29256715
-
Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019. PMID: 30296732
-
Smartphone applications for depression: a systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals' attitudes towards their use in clinical practice.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;270(2):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0974-3. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 30607530
-
Perceptions of Smartphone User-Centered Mobile Health Tracking Apps Across Various Chronic Illness Populations: An Integrative Review.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Jul;49(4):371-378. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12298. Epub 2017 Jun 12. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017. PMID: 28605151 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of COVID-19 on hand therapy practice.J Hand Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;35(4):523-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 1. J Hand Ther. 2022. PMID: 33820708 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Application of Health Education Apps Based on WeChat for Self-Management among Patients.Iran J Public Health. 2022 May;51(5):1020-1029. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9417. Iran J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36407732 Free PMC article.
-
Opinions of healthcare providers on the design of a smartphone application for asthma treatment in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020 Feb 27;15(1):508. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2020.508. eCollection 2020 Jan 28. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020. PMID: 32269774 Free PMC article.
-
Health Literacy Promotion and Digital Interventions for Depressive Disorders.Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Oct;8(4):e236-e245. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240730-01. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Health Lit Res Pract. 2024. PMID: 39642046 Free PMC article.
-
GPs' attitudes towards and experiences of using the Dermabuddy health app for the management of patients with dermatological conditions: a descriptive cross-sectional study.BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3):BJGPO.2024.0038. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0038. Print 2024 Oct. BJGP Open. 2024. PMID: 38580390 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous