Why should we extend transcatheter aortic valve implantation to low-risk patients? A comprehensive review
- PMID: 31014990
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.03.004
Why should we extend transcatheter aortic valve implantation to low-risk patients? A comprehensive review
Abstract
Within the past decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become established as the optimal treatment option for elderly, inoperable and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, and is now recommended by international guidelines. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the non-inferiority of TAVI to open surgery in intermediate-risk patients and, most recently, in low-risk patients. Further randomized controlled trials are underway, but existing studies have already provided reassuring data in this cohort, and TAVI is offered routinely to younger and lower-risk patients in numerous centers. Improvements in the design of devices and delivery systems, accompanied by increased operator experience, have dramatically improved the safety of the procedure, and further expansion into low-risk groups seems inevitable once concerns about valve durability and device cost have been addressed. In this article, we provide a review of the existing literature, and estimate the clinical impact of TAVI in low-risk patients. Abbreviated title: Why should we extend TAVI to low-risk patients?
Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Percutané; Remplacement valvulaire aortique; Sténose aortique; TAVI; TAVR.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
Expanding the indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):75-84. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0254-6. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31527743 Review.
-
Transcatheter Valve Replacement: Risk Levels and Contemporary Outcomes.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):126-131. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-126. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017. PMID: 29743997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate- and Low-Risk Patients.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 12;7(10):e007147. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007147. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29754127 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation is more successful with the Edwards Sapien 3 compared with the Edwards XT for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Aug-Sep;111(8-9):470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018. PMID: 29128473
-
Short- and mid-term outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with advanced age.Cardiol J. 2017;24(4):358-363. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0093. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Cardiol J. 2017. PMID: 27747858
Cited by
-
Current issues in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1665-1680. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.10. J Thorac Dis. 2020. PMID: 32395310 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31860123 Free PMC article.
-
[Transcatheter mitral valve replacement: current status].Herz. 2019 Nov;44(7):602-610. doi: 10.1007/s00059-019-04851-9. Herz. 2019. PMID: 31486886 German.
-
The Transaxillary Route as a Second Access Option in TAVI Procedures: Experience of a Single Centre.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148649. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35886501 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous