Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;69(682):e304-e313.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702425.

General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care

Affiliations

General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care

Bethany F Anthony et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Previous systematic reviews have found that nurses and pharmacists can provide equivalent, or higher, quality of care for some tasks performed by GPs in primary care. There is a lack of economic evidence for this substitution.

Aim: To explore the costs and outcomes of role substitution between GPs and nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals in primary care.

Design and setting: A systematic review of economic evaluations exploring role substitution of allied health professionals in primary care was conducted. Role substitution was defined as 'the substitution of work that was previously completed by a GP in the past and is now completed by a nurse or allied health professional'.

Method: The following databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The review followed guidance from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Results: Six economic evaluations were identified. There was some limited evidence that nurse-led care for common minor health problems was cost-effective compared with GP care, and that nurse-led interventions for chronic fatigue syndrome and pharmacy-led services for the medicines management of coronary heart disease and chronic pain were not. In South Korea, community health practitioners delivered primary care services for half the cost of physicians. The review did not identify studies for other allied health professionals such as physiotherapists and occupational therapists.

Conclusion: There is limited economic evidence for role substitution in primary care; more economic evaluations are needed.

Keywords: allied health personnel; cost–benefit evaluation; general practitioners; nurses; primary health care; role substitution; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systematic review flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hayhoe B, Majeed A, Hamlyn M, Sinha M. Primary care workforce crisis: how many more GPs do we need?. Presented at RCGP Annual Conference; Harrogate. 2016.
    1. Laurant M, Harmsen M, Wollersheim H, et al. The impact of nonphysician clinicians: do they improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care services? Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66(Suppl 6):36S–89S. - PubMed
    1. Laurant MG, Reeves D, Hermens RP, et al. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2(2):CD001271. - PubMed
    1. Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ. 2002;324(7341):819–823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuethe MC, Vaessen-Verberne AA, Elbers RG, Van Aalderen WM. Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2(2):CD009296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009296.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources