A multicentre, prospective study of plasma circulating tumour DNA test for detecting RAS mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
- PMID: 31015557
- PMCID: PMC6734650
- DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0457-y
A multicentre, prospective study of plasma circulating tumour DNA test for detecting RAS mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Erratum in
-
Correction: A multicentre, prospective study of plasma circulating tumour DNA test for detecting RAS mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2020 Apr;122(8):1271. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0766-1. Br J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32099097 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: OncoBEAMTM RAS CRC kit using BEAMing technology is a circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) test for detecting plasma RAS mutational status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a multicentre, prospective study to investigate the concordance of the RAS mutational status between plasma ctDNA and tumour tissue DNA.
Methods: mCRC patients without prior anti-EGFR antibodies or regorafenib treatment were enroled. Plasma- and tissue-based RAS mutational status were determined by BEAMing, respectively.
Results: A total of 280 patients from eight institutions were eligible. The overall agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 86.4%, with a positive percent agreement of 82.1% and negative percent agreement of 90.4%. From logistic regression analysis, lung metastasis alone indicated the most significant factor associated with discordance. The agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 64.5% in patients with lung metastasis alone (n = 31) indicating lower amount of ctDNA. Among the cases with lung metastasis alone, all plasma- and tissue-based analyses were perfectly concordant in cases with ≥20 mm of maximum lesion diameter or ≥10 lesions.
Conclusion: The clinical validity of OncoBEAMTM RAS CRC kit was confirmed. Careful attention should be paid for mCRC patients with lung metastases alone having fewer metastases or smaller diameter lesions.
Conflict of interest statement
H.B. reports research funding from AstraZeneca; T.D. reports research funding from Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim and MSD and honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Yakult Honsha, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; Y.K. reports the research funds from Merck Serono, Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Yakut Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, MSD, Kyowa-kirin, Shionogi, Nipro, Dainihon, Eisai, BMS, Bayer Japan, and Pfizer; E.O. has received honoraria for lecturing from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Bayer Japan, Yakult Honsha, Merck Serono, Takeda, and Chugai Pharmaceutical; T.K. reports research funding from Yakult Honsha, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Ono; H.K. reports employment by Sysmex Corporation during the conduct of the study; T.Y. reports research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical and Takeda, honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and advisory role from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Sysmex, and HUYA Bioscience, and reports research funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Chugai Pharmaceutical; and Y.K., T.K., T.N., and K.A. report no competing interest.
Figures
References
-
- Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, Pentheroudakis G, Yamazaki K, Xu RH, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO–ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:44–70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx738. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schmiegel W, Scott RJ, Dooley S, Lewis W, Meldrum CJ, Pockney P, et al. Blood-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer patients: concordance of results from circulating tumor DNA and tissue-based RAS testing. Mol. Oncol. 2017;11:208–219. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
