Validation of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and the surgical risk scale in major general surgical operations in Harare: A prospective observational study
- PMID: 31016016
- PMCID: PMC6475666
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.03.007
Validation of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and the surgical risk scale in major general surgical operations in Harare: A prospective observational study
Abstract
Background: Raw mortality and morbidity, though commonly studied in surgical audit can nonetheless be misleading because of differences in preoperative and intraoperative findings of patients. There are some common scoring systems specifically designed to cater for case mix but these have not been tried locally. This study sought to validate these scoring systems and hopefully adopt them for our teaching hospitals.
Materials and methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at two central hospitals in Harare Two hundred and two patients undergoing a variety of major general surgical operations were recruited into the study. Results of physiological and intraoperative parameters collected from the patients' records were scored according to POSSUM, P-POSSUM and SRS scores. Predicted mortality and morbidity rates of all these subjects were then compared to the observed rates.
Results: One hundred and eighty one patients participated (123 males, 58 females). Using the POSSUM morbidity score, the observed versus expected (O: E) ratio of 0.88 showed no difference (p = 0.970). Using POSSUM, P-POSSUM and SRS mortality scores, O: E ratios of 0.74, 1.06 and 1.0 respectively were obtained, the differences were not significant (p = 0.650, p = 0.987 and 0.730). All three scores were comparable on the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. The Physiological score independently predicted mortality (p < 0.00001).
Conclusion: POSSUM, P-POSSUM and SRS scores are comparable and suitable for estimating outcomes after major surgery in Harare. A larger study inclusive of low risk patients is needed to generalise these findings across Zimbabwean patients.
Keywords: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; Audit; P-POSSUM, Portsmouth-POSSUM; POSSUM; POSSUM, Physiological and Operative Severity Scoring for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity; Risk scoring system; SRS, Surgical Risk Scale.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the POSSUM, P-POSSUM and E-PASS scores in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun 24;12:191. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-191. World J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24961847 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-Adjusted Analysis of Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Using POSSUM and P-POSSUM Score: A Prospective Study.Niger J Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;25(1):45-51. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_11_18. Niger J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31007512 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1627-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3141-4. Epub 2018 Aug 4. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 30078107 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-adjusted scoring systems in colorectal surgery.Int J Surg. 2011;9(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Int J Surg. 2011. PMID: 21059414 Review.
-
The accuracy of pre-operative (P)-POSSUM scoring and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in predicting morbidity and mortality after pancreatic and liver surgery: A systematic review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 28;62:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.016. eCollection 2021 Feb. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 33489107 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Application of POSSUM and P-POSSUM in Surgical Risk Assessment of Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery.Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 12;15:1121-1128. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S258659. eCollection 2020. Clin Interv Aging. 2020. PMID: 32764899 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes of Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgeries.Oman Med J. 2025 Jan 31;40(1):e711. doi: 10.5001/omj.2025.43. eCollection 2025 Jan. Oman Med J. 2025. PMID: 40761473 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Apgar Score can accurately predict the severity of post-operative complications following emergency laparotomy.BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02088-2. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37415104 Free PMC article.
-
Morbidity and mortality after elective cancer surgery-How does recent Covid-19 infection impact outcome: A prospective, comparative study.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):645-652. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_232_23. Epub 2024 Jun 27. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39759068 Free PMC article.
-
Use of POSSUM (Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Study of Mortality and Morbidity) and Portsmouth-POSSUM for Surgical Assessment in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgeries.Cureus. 2023 Jun 23;15(6):e40850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40850. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37489217 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Surgical Audit and Peer Review . vol. 3. 2008. A Guide by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; pp. 2–46.www.surgeons.org/publications
-
- Ghaferi A.A., Birkmeyer J.D., Dimick J.B. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1368–1375. - PubMed
-
- Copeland G.P., Jones D., Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br. J. Surg. 1991;78:355–360. - PubMed
-
- Whiteley M.S., Prytherch D.R., Higgins B., Weaver P.C., Prout W.G. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br. J. Surg. 1996;83:812–815. - PubMed
-
- Prytherch D.R., Whiteley M.S., H B. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enUmeration of mortality and morbidity. Br. J. Surg. 1998;85(9):1217–1220. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources