Patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring technologies in the acute care setting: A systematic review
- PMID: 31017338
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14893
Patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring technologies in the acute care setting: A systematic review
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To examine patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring devices in the acute setting.
Background: Wearable vital sign monitoring devices may improve patient safety, yet hospital patients' acceptability of these devices is largely unreported.
Design: A systematic review.
Methods: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, MEDLINE Complete and EMBASE were searched, supplemented by reference list hand searching. Studies were included if they involved adult hospital patients (≥18 years), a wearable monitoring device capable of assessing ≥1 vital sign, and measured patient acceptability, satisfaction or experience of wearing the device. No date restrictions were enforced. Quality assessments of quantitative and qualitative studies were undertaken using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Study Quality and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist, respectively. Meta-analyses were not possible given data heterogeneity and low research quality. Reporting adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was completed.
Results: Of the 427 studies screened, seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies were of low quality and one was of high quality. In two studies, patient satisfaction was investigated. In the remaining studies, patient experience, patient opinions and experience, patient perceptions and experience, device acceptability, and patient comfort and concerns were investigated. In four studies, patients were mostly accepting of the wearable devices, reporting positive experiences and satisfaction relating to their use. In three studies, findings were mixed.
Conclusion: There is limited high-quality research examining patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring devices as an a priori focus in the acute setting. Further understanding of patient perspectives of these devices is required to inform their continued use and development.
Relevance to clinical practice: The provision of patient-centred nursing care is contingent on understanding patients' preferences, including their acceptability of technology use.
Keywords: Medical Subject Headings; Wireless Technology; nursing assessment; patient participation; patient preference; patient satisfaction; vital signs; wearable electronic devices.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 17;22(6):e18636. doi: 10.2196/18636. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32469323 Free PMC article.
-
Novel wearable and contactless monitoring devices to identify deteriorating patients in the clinical setting: a systematic review protocol.Syst Rev. 2020 May 6;9(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01370-1. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32375867 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Acceptability and Technical Reliability of Wearable Devices Used for Monitoring People With Parkinson Disease: Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e63704. doi: 10.2196/63704. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40135976 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' experience of wearing multimodal sensor devices intended to detect epileptic seizures: A qualitative analysis.Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jan;102:106717. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106717. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Epilepsy Behav. 2020. PMID: 31785481
-
Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):e54. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9409. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018. PMID: 29510969 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework.Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7. Implement Sci. 2022. PMID: 35086538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Parental perceptions of a wearable vital signs monitor for observation of newborns: in-depth interviews in three tertiary hospitals, Southwest Nigeria.Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 28;7:1597651. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1597651. eCollection 2025. Front Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40791998 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring with a Wireless Device on a General Ward: A Survey to Explore Nurses' Experiences in a Post-Implementation Period.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 11;20(10):5794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105794. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37239523 Free PMC article.
-
The Hospital to Home study (H2H): smartwatch technology-enabled rehabilitation following hip fracture in older adults, a feasibility non-randomised trial.Future Healthc J. 2023 Mar;10(1):14-20. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0101. Future Healthc J. 2023. PMID: 37786494 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of the Support From Community Health Workers and Health Care Professionals on the Sustained Use of Wearable Monitoring Devices Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e52435. doi: 10.2196/52435. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39556810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous