Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):186.
doi: 10.3390/ani9040186.

Grooming Device Effects on Behaviour and Welfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle

Affiliations

Grooming Device Effects on Behaviour and Welfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle

Shigeru Ninomiya. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

In livestock farming, a stark or barren environment compromises animal welfare. Environmental enrichment has been used to address the issue. For this study, after fattening cattle were provided with a grooming device (a brush), its effect on animal self-grooming and welfare were investigated. For Research trial 1 and 2, respectively, 28 and 11 Japanese Black steers were observed. Three or four of the animals were group-housed in a pen. For Trial 1, half of the animals were provided with a brush. The animals' behaviour, carcass weight, and Viscera disease were recorded. Enrichment animals (E) performed self-grooming and scratching of the animals' body on the brush and pen structures more than control animals (C) did (mean time budgets, 3.34% (SD = 2.48) in E and 0.89% (SD = 0.81) in C, GLMM, z value = 8.28, p < 0.001). The number of animals in which viscera disease was detected after slaughter was lower in E than in C (E = 0, C = 4, a Fisher's exact probability test, p = 0.03). In Trial 2, brush use behaviour was observed continuously for 72 h. The observation revealed that the animals scratched various body parts on the brush. Results show that providing a brush as environmental enrichment improves welfare by satisfying the motivation of fattening cattle to perform self-grooming.

Keywords: animal welfare; environmental enrichment; fattening cattle; grooming device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, related to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grooming device (brush) used in this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Keeling L.J., Rushen J., Duncan I.J.H. Understanding Animal Welfare. In: Appleby M.C., Olsson I.A.S., Galindo F., editors. Animal Welfare. 3rd ed. CABI; Oxfordshire, UK: 2018. pp. 16–35.
    1. Mason G.J., Burn C.C. Frustration and Boredom in Impoverished Environments. In: Appleby M.C., Olsson I.A.S., Galindo F., editors. Animal Welfare. 3rd ed. CABI; Oxfordshire, UK: 2018. pp. 114–138.
    1. Ninomiya S. Satisfaction of farm animal behavioral needs in behaviorally restricted systems: Reducing stressors and environmental enrichment. Anim. Sci. J. 2014;85:634–638. doi: 10.1111/asj.12213. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pelley M.C., Lirette A., Tennessen T. Observations on the responses of feedlot cattle to attempted environmental enrichment. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;75:631–632. doi: 10.4141/cjas95-093. - DOI
    1. Wilson S.C., Mitlohner F.M., Morrow-Tesch J., Dailey J.W., McGlone J.J. An assessment of several potential enrichment devices for feedlot cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:259–265. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00019-9. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources