Grooming Device Effects on Behaviour and Welfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle
- PMID: 31018483
- PMCID: PMC6523527
- DOI: 10.3390/ani9040186
Grooming Device Effects on Behaviour and Welfare of Japanese Black Fattening Cattle
Abstract
In livestock farming, a stark or barren environment compromises animal welfare. Environmental enrichment has been used to address the issue. For this study, after fattening cattle were provided with a grooming device (a brush), its effect on animal self-grooming and welfare were investigated. For Research trial 1 and 2, respectively, 28 and 11 Japanese Black steers were observed. Three or four of the animals were group-housed in a pen. For Trial 1, half of the animals were provided with a brush. The animals' behaviour, carcass weight, and Viscera disease were recorded. Enrichment animals (E) performed self-grooming and scratching of the animals' body on the brush and pen structures more than control animals (C) did (mean time budgets, 3.34% (SD = 2.48) in E and 0.89% (SD = 0.81) in C, GLMM, z value = 8.28, p < 0.001). The number of animals in which viscera disease was detected after slaughter was lower in E than in C (E = 0, C = 4, a Fisher's exact probability test, p = 0.03). In Trial 2, brush use behaviour was observed continuously for 72 h. The observation revealed that the animals scratched various body parts on the brush. Results show that providing a brush as environmental enrichment improves welfare by satisfying the motivation of fattening cattle to perform self-grooming.
Keywords: animal welfare; environmental enrichment; fattening cattle; grooming device.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, related to this study.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Loss of a grooming enrichment impacts physical, behavioural, and physiological measures of welfare in grazing beef cattle.Animal. 2024 Mar;18(3):101091. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101091. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Animal. 2024. PMID: 38428372
-
Effects of 'Five freedoms' environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors.Anim Sci J. 2009 Jun;80(3):347-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00627.x. Anim Sci J. 2009. PMID: 20163647
-
Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate.Biol Lett. 2018 Aug;14(8):20180303. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303. Biol Lett. 2018. PMID: 30089661 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing grooming behavior patterns and the influence of brush access on the behavior of group-housed dairy calves.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3421-3430. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15460. Epub 2019 Feb 7. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 30738669
-
Change of fatty acid composition of the lumbar longissimus during the final stage of fattening in the Japanese Black cattle.Anim Sci J. 2016 Apr;87(4):578-83. doi: 10.1111/asj.12443. Epub 2015 Aug 17. Anim Sci J. 2016. PMID: 26279279 Review.
Cited by
-
How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 2;9(10):758. doi: 10.3390/ani9100758. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31581658 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare.Anim Welf. 2023 Feb 14;32:e14. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.5. eCollection 2023. Anim Welf. 2023. PMID: 38487434 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring Calves' Usage of Multiple Environmental Enrichment Objects Provided Simultaneously.Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 1;8:698681. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.698681. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34660753 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical environmental enrichment to improve animal welfare-related outcomes in indoor cattle.Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 13;34:e37. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.28. eCollection 2025. Anim Welf. 2025. PMID: 40529167 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Pure and Crossbred Japanese Black Steers in Growth Performance and Metabolic Features from Birth to Slaughter at a Spanish Fattening Farm.Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(13):1671. doi: 10.3390/ani12131671. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35804572 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Keeling L.J., Rushen J., Duncan I.J.H. Understanding Animal Welfare. In: Appleby M.C., Olsson I.A.S., Galindo F., editors. Animal Welfare. 3rd ed. CABI; Oxfordshire, UK: 2018. pp. 16–35.
-
- Mason G.J., Burn C.C. Frustration and Boredom in Impoverished Environments. In: Appleby M.C., Olsson I.A.S., Galindo F., editors. Animal Welfare. 3rd ed. CABI; Oxfordshire, UK: 2018. pp. 114–138.
-
- Pelley M.C., Lirette A., Tennessen T. Observations on the responses of feedlot cattle to attempted environmental enrichment. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;75:631–632. doi: 10.4141/cjas95-093. - DOI
-
- Wilson S.C., Mitlohner F.M., Morrow-Tesch J., Dailey J.W., McGlone J.J. An assessment of several potential enrichment devices for feedlot cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:259–265. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00019-9. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources