Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross - sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs
- PMID: 31018984
- PMCID: PMC6716360
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008524
Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross - sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate patients' perceptions of their meetings with healthcare professionals and the extent to which they believe they can influence patient safety in these meetings.
Design: Cross-sectional survey of patients using a study-specific questionnaire. Data were analysed using both parametric and non-parametric statistics.
Setting: The study was conducted in primary and secondary care in three county councils in southeast Sweden by means of a survey questionnaire despatched in January 2017.
Participants: Survey data were collected from 1445 patients, 333 of whom were complainants (patients who had filed a complaint about being harmed in healthcare) and 1112 regular patients (patients recruited from healthcare units).
Main outcome measures: Patients' perceptions of meetings with physicians and nurses, beliefs concerning patients' contributions to safer care and whether the patients had suffered harm in healthcare during the past 10 years.
Results: Most respondents reported that it was easy to ask physicians and nurses questions (84.9% and 86.6%) and to point out if something felt odd in their care (77.7% and 80.7%). In general, complainants agreed to a higher extent compared with regular patients that patients can contribute to safer care (mean 1.92 and 2.13, p<0.001). Almost one-third (31.2%) of the respondents (both complainants and regular patients) reported that they had suffered harm in healthcare during the past 10 years.
Conclusions: Most respondents believed that healthcare professionals can facilitate patient interaction and increase patient safety by encouraging patients to ask questions and take an active part in their care. Further research will need to identify strategies to support such questioning in routine practice and ensure that it achieves its intended goals.
Keywords: adverse events, epidemiology and detection; medical error, measurement/epidemiology; patient safety; patient satisfaction.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-focused interventions: a review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation, 2006.
-
- World Health Organization Patients for Patient Safety. Partnerships for Safer Health Care. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous