Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 24;9(1):6492.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43084-y.

Accurate early prediction of tumour response to PDT using optical coherence angiography

Affiliations

Accurate early prediction of tumour response to PDT using optical coherence angiography

M A Sirotkina et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Prediction of tumour treatment response may play a crucial role in therapy selection and optimization of its delivery parameters. Here we use optical coherence angiography (OCA) as a minimally-invasive, label-free, real-time bioimaging method to visualize normal and pathological perfused vessels and monitor treatment response following vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT). Preclinical results are reported in a convenient experimental model (CT-26 colon tumour inoculated in murine ear), enabling controlled PDT and post-treatment OCA monitoring. To accurately predict long-term treatment outcome, a robust and simple microvascular metric is proposed. It is based on perfused vessels density (PVD) at t = 24 hours post PDT, calculated for both tumour and peri-tumour regions. Histological validation in the examined experimental cohort (n = 31 animals) enabled further insight into the excellent predictive power of the derived early-response OCA microvascular metric. The results underscore the key role of peri-tumour microvasculature in determining the long-term PDT response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perfused microvascular network architecture in a mouse ear visualized by optical coherence angiography (OCA). (a) 2D projection of 3D OCA data showing typical normal ear microcirculation; (b) OCA of CT-26 tumour growing in a mouse ear (two weeks after tumour cells inoculation); (c,d) are the corresponding white-light photographs of the mouse ear. Black dotted lines indicate the 2.5 × 2.5 mm2 regions of OCA imaging.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OCA images of tumour and peri-tumourous perfused microvascular reaction at t = 24 hrs post PDT. (a) before PDT; (b) OCA example of a responder (no visible perfused vessels in the tumour, and extremely low PVD in peri-tumourous tissue); (c) OCA example of a non-responder (no perfused vessels inside the tumour, but many perfused vessels in peri-tumourous tissue). The tumour borders (indicated by dashed contours) were automatically segmented using machine learning pixel classification technique.
Figure 3
Figure 3
OCA-derived PVD changes after treatment for predicting PDT success. (a) PVD temporal evolution in the tumour, and (b) in the peri-tumourous tissue; error bars signify standard deviation. (c) percentage of correctly predicted outcomes (CPO) based on PVD values at the three post-treatment time points. Dots indicate values calculated from the experimental data, bars indicate the 95% Wilson score confidence intervals (based on the sample size (n = 31) and the number of correctly predicted outcomes).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphical summary of the OCA-based PDT success assessment scheme, based on tumour and peri-tumourous microvascular reaction at t = 24 hrs after treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histological assessment of treatment outcomes at t = 7 days post PDT. Left column’s two panels exhibit an illustrative responder. (a) Total tumour necrosis (>95%) in the central part of tumour (blue arrows). (b) Total necrosis of ‘normal’ ear tissue ~2 mm distant from the tumour edge (but still within the PDT treatment field). Right column’s two panels exhibit an illustrative non-responder. (c) Partial tumour necrosis (~75%) and viable tumour region. (d) Undamaged ‘normal’ ear tissue ~2 mm away from the tumour edge (but still within the PDT treatment field). Central white-light photograph shows the colour-coded orientation of the two histological sections displayed for each illustrative case.
Figure 6
Figure 6
OCT/OCA data acquisition and signal processing overview. (a) white light image of the tumour-bearing murine ear, with superimposed scanning pattern; colored points represent individual positions of the scanning beam, scanning locations corresponding to the opposite scanning directions are represented in different colors (blue and red); only data acquired during one-directional scanning (from left to right, blue dots on the schematic) were used for OCA processing. Note the absence of repeated scanning at the same position, unlike many OCA methods. Inset shows the details of scanning beam cross sections overlap; (b) 3D OCT volume 2.4 × 2.4 × 1.5 mm; c – 3D OCA volume constructed using high-frequency finite-impulse response filtering (FIR-filter) of the 3D image along the slow axis; d – en face Maximum Intensity Projection of the volume represented in (c); e – en face microvascular image after tumour segmentation: vessels inside the tumour are red and peri-tumourous vessels are green. In (d,e), scale bars are 0.5 mm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cabete J, et al. Long-term recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancer after topical methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy in a dermato-oncology department. Brazilian Annals of Dermatology. 2015;90(6):846–850. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gangloff P, et al. Photodynamic therapy as salvage treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer. Médecine Buccale Chirurgie Buccale. 2012;18:325–331. doi: 10.1051/mbcb/2012033. - DOI
    1. Lindberg-Larsen R, Sølvsten H, Kragballe K. Evaluation of recurrence after photodynamic therapy with topical methylaminolaevulinate for 157 basal cell carcinomas in 90 patients. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2012;92:144–147. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fantini F, et al. Photodynamic therapy for basal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathological determinants of response. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2011;25:896–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03877.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one - photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2004;1(4):279–93. doi: 10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00007-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types