Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;13(2):99-105.
doi: 10.1177/2049463718820056. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

The context of litigation in evaluating physical and psychological outcomes from pain management programmes

Hannah Twiddy  1 , Richard J Brown  2 , Hasan Waheed  1
Affiliations

The context of litigation in evaluating physical and psychological outcomes from pain management programmes

Hannah Twiddy et al. Br J Pain. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objectives: There has been extensive research in evaluating chronic pain in the context of litigation while considering the implications that it can have on healthcare outcomes and rehabilitation progress. The aim of this article is to present retrospective observational data about the levels of disability and distress reported by patients with ongoing litigation at the start and following a UK-based multi-disciplinary pain management programme (PMP) when compared with those without litigation.

Method: Between June 2014 and September 2017, 859 patients attended and completed a 16-day PMP at a tertiary-level National Health Service (UK) pain clinic. Patients were split into two groups: (1) litigation (n = 110) and (2) non-litigation (n = 749). As a part of the assessment procedure, the patients were given a battery of psychological and physical measures to complete over two time points.

Results: Patients with litigation are statistically significantly more distressed at assessment but make comparable clinically meaningful change in PMP intervention when compared with a non-litigation sample. A very small proportion of the variance in depression scores post-treatment is accounted for by the context of litigation (0.5%), which may be accounted for by employment status. There was no effect of litigation on physical outcome post-intervention.

Discussion: This article concludes that it is not appropriate to merely assume that the context of litigation results in limited positive psychological and physical outcomes post-PMP. There are some limitations to the clinical sample presented in respect to the conclusions.

Keywords: Chronic pain; legal; litigation; outcomes; pain management; pain management programme; psychology; self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. The British Pain Society. Guidelines for pain management programmes for adults: an evidence-based review. Resource Document, 2013, www.britishpainsociety.org
    1. Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, et al. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol 2007; 26(1): 1–9. - PubMed
    1. de C, Williams A, Eccleston C, et al. Psychological therapy for adults with longstanding distressing pain and disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, https://www.cochrane.org/CD007407/SYMPT_psychological-therapy-adults-lon...
    1. Roberts AH, Reinhardt L. The behavioral management of chronic pain: long-term follow-up with comparison groups. Pain 1980; 8(2): 151–162. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs MS. Psychological factors influencing chronic pain and the impact of litigation. Curr Phys Med Rehab Rep 2013; 1(2): 135–141.