Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 16;5(2):177-186.
doi: 10.1002/osp4.323. eCollection 2019 Apr.

Novel ranking of protective and risk factors for adolescent adiposity in US females

Affiliations

Novel ranking of protective and risk factors for adolescent adiposity in US females

A Narla et al. Obes Sci Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: Rank the importance of potentially modifiable psychosocial, dietary and environmental risk and protective factors for female adolescent obesity in order to target and inform public health prevention efforts. Utilizing the largest dataset available that captures the onset of the adolescent obesity surge in the USA, the study provides a more robust understanding of paediatric obesity risk factors.

Methods: Data were obtained from an observational, longitudinal study conducted between 1989 and 2001, the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. This study includes girls aged 9-19 years from three urban US locations, with Black and White girls generally represented equally. Data were analysed using multiple regression, random forest and propensity score matching to determine the strongest adiposity risk and protective factors during ages 9-12 predicting adiposity at age 19 with multiple methods to maximize the ability to identify possible public health interventions. Multiple linear regression and random forest analysis identified the strongest associations among 288 risk and protective factors selected from the study's literature review. For the 190 factors associated with follow-up adiposity from the data, propensity score matching was used to control for confounding of these factors.

Results: Findings suggest that highest priority interventional targets across the domains surveyed are lowering specific nutrients; eating meals with others or during activities without skipping; parents fixing evening snacks; improving perceptions of non-extremes as the healthy weight; improving self-worth, physical activity and social competence; and limiting any negative impact of dieting relatives. Similar associations were observed for Black and White girls.

Conclusion: The clinical implications of these findings allow health practitioners to target behavioural change efforts and address social and environmental factors that have demonstrated higher prioritization value for early obesity interventional efforts for adolescents.

Keywords: Adiposity; Machine learning; Obesity; Predictive analytics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Random forest variable importance of adiposity predictors
Figure 2
Figure 2
Population attributable risk plot – stratified by variable category

References

    1. Maier JH, Barry R. Associations among physical activity, diet, and obesity measures change during adolescence. J Nutr Metab 2015;2015:805065 10.1155/2015/805065 , 1 – 8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huh D, Stice E, Shaw H, Boutelle K. Female overweight and obesity in adolescence: developmental trends and ethnic differences in prevalence, incidence, and remission. J Youth Adolesc 2012; 41: 76–85. 10.1007/s10964-011-9664-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee H, Pantazis A, Cheng P, Dennisuk L, Clarke PJ, Lee JM. The association between adolescent obesity and disability incidence in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health 2016; 59: 472–478. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gracia‐Marco L, Moreno LA, Ruiz JR, et al. Body composition indices and single and clustered cardiovascular disease risk factors in adolescents: providing clinical‐based cut‐points. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 2016; 58: 555–564. 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004; 291: 1238–1245. 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources