Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Mar 25:2019:8349793.
doi: 10.1155/2019/8349793. eCollection 2019.

Treating Penile Cancer in the Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Era

Affiliations
Case Reports

Treating Penile Cancer in the Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Era

Gavin Hui et al. Case Rep Oncol Med. .

Abstract

While localized penile cancers are typically treated surgically and metastatic penile cancers benefit from standard chemotherapy, there have been studies on the horizon demonstrating immunotherapy as a novel approach to metastatic penile cancers that have failed standard chemotherapy. We report a case series of two patients who improved on immunotherapy after progressing with standard chemotherapy regimens. The first case describes a 64-year-old male with a penile mass and significant lymphadenopathy who had surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy prior to continued disease progression. He was started on anti-EGFR treatment and improved initially, but he eventually had progression of disease. The second case describes a 79-year-old male with a penile mass who was treated with surgical resection and started on adjuvant chemoradiation, but he developed recurrence and nodal involvement. Therefore, second-line therapy of the PD-L1 inhibitor was started in this patient. There were no available clinical trials for penile cancer patients who progressed beyond the standard surgical therapy and chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosconi A. M., Roila F., Gatta G., Theodore C. Cancer of the penis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2005;53(2):165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marconnet L., Rigaud J., Bouchot O. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy. Journal of Urology. 2010;183(6):2227–2232. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickstein R. J., Munsell M. F., Pagliaro L. C., Pettaway C. A. Prognostic factors influencing survival from regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis after preoperative chemotherapy. BJU International. 2016;117(1):118–125. doi: 10.1111/bju.12946. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pagliaro L. C., Williams D. L., Daliani D., et al. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(24):3851–3857. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types