Unusual presence of 'ghosts' following lead extraction for recurrent reactive pericarditis: a case report
- PMID: 31020203
- PMCID: PMC6426005
- DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty127
Unusual presence of 'ghosts' following lead extraction for recurrent reactive pericarditis: a case report
Abstract
Background: The presence of a persistent fibrous sheath in right-sided heart chambers after transvenous lead extraction has already been described in some studies as echocardiographic tubular mobile masses called 'ghosts'. Their presence has been associated with cardiac device-related infective endocarditis or local device infection, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case where 'ghosts' have been reported among non-infected patients.
Case summary: We present a case of a 73-year-old woman hospitalized due to worsening dyspnoea and a significant pericardial effusion, relapsed after pericardiocentesis with removal of about 1500 mL of non-haemorrhagic fluid. The patient's history revealed a previous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation due to symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), essential to exclude endocarditis vegetations suggested an etiopathogenesis of mechanical irritation caused by the distal end of the passive fixation atrial lead on the right atrial appendage wall. Considering the echocardiographic report and the condition of reactive pericarditis with the early relapse of the significant pericardial effusion after pericardiocentesis, we opted for a lead removal procedure to eliminate the stimulus causing the irritation, with transoesophageal echocardiographic monitoring, thus the early detection of a 'ghost' was possible.
Discussion: This is the first clinical case describing the presence of fibrin 'ghosts' sometime after the implantation of a pacemaker, highlighting a non-exclusively infectious genesis, and emphasizing the importance of TOE for the early detection of this post-extraction complication and its monitoring.
Keywords: Cardiac rhythm device; Case report; Ghosts; Recurrent pericarditis; Transvenous lead extraction.
Figures
References
-
- Narducci ML, Di Monaco A, Pelargonio G, Leoncini E, Boccia S, Mollo R, Perna F, Bencardino G, Pennestrì F, Scoppettuolo G, Rebuzzi AG, Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Natale A, Crea F.. Presence of ‘ghosts’ and mortality after transvenous lead extraction. Europace 2017;19:432–440. - PubMed
-
- Levy Y, Shovman O, Granit C, Luria D, Gurevitz O, Bar-Lev D, Eldar M, Shoenfeld Y, Glikson M.. Pericarditis following permanent pacemaker insertion. Isr Med Assoc J 2004;6:599–602. - PubMed
-
- Ohlow MA, Lauer B, Brunelli M, Geller JC.. Incidence and predictors of pericardial effusion after permanent heart rhythm device implantation: prospective evaluation of 968 consecutive patients. Circ J 2013;77:975–981. - PubMed
-
- Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha Y-M, Clancy J, Deharo J-C, Ellenbogen KA, Exner D, Hussein AA, Kennergren C, Krahn A, Lee R, Love CJ, Madden RA, Mazzetti HA, Moore JC, Parsonnet J, Patton KK, Rozner MA, Selzman KA, Shoda M, Srivathsan K, Strathmore NF, Swerdlow CD, Tompkins C, Wazni O.. 2017 Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm 2017;14:e503–e551. - PubMed
-
- Le Dolley Y, Thuny F, Mancini J, Casalta J-P, Riberi A, Gouriet F, Bastard E, Ansaldi S, Franceschi F, Renard S, Prevot S, Giorgi R, Tafanelli L, Avierinos J-F, Raoult D, Deharo J-C, Habib G.. Diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis after device removal. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:673–681. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources