Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department
- PMID: 31021382
- PMCID: PMC6488008
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0864
Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department
Abstract
Importance: Convenient outpatient access for ophthalmology patients seeking urgent care could offer savings compared with an emergency department (ED) visit.
Objective: To evaluate the costs and visit durations of same-day access (SDA) in an ophthalmology department at an academic medical center vs ED care.
Design, setting, and participants: This single-center study was a retrospective quality improvement analysis of an institutional electronic medical record system at the Wilmer Eye Institute clinics and the Johns Hopkins Hospital ED. On June 1, 2015, the Wilmer Eye Institute and Johns Hopkins Hospital initiated an official policy of providing SDA to patients calling for appointments (ie, the same-day project). All ophthalmology clinic locations created same-day appointment slots for at least 1 practitioner. In recognition of seasonal variations in patient visit volumes, the 10 months before implementation (August 1, 2014, to May 31, 2015) were compared with complementary periods in 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017.
Main outcomes and measures: The study tabulated encounters, charges, and visit length for outpatients seen on the same day or by previously scheduled appointments. For the ED patients, volume, diagnoses, charges, and length of stay data were collected. The numbers of SDA patients who indicated urgency were tabulated.
Results: The number of SDA patients increased from 22 781 to 26 579 for the first year after SDA implementation. The mean charge was $258 (95% CI, $250-$266; median, $184; interquartile range [IQR], $175-$320), and the mean clinic transit time was 1.55 hours (95% CI, 1.54-1.57 hours; median, 1.28 hours). For patients seeking eye care in the ED, the mean professional fee was $401 (95% CI, $390-$411; median, $360; IQR, $255-$500), the mean (SD) total hospital charge was $1040 ($999) (95% CI, $729-$1079; median, $1002; IQR, $334-$1429), and the mean length of stay was 7.30 hours (95% CI, 7.01-7.57 hours; median, 7.20 hours). The top 4 ophthalmic diagnoses for ED patients were conjunctivitis, cornea abrasion, iritis, and visual loss, which were unchanged after SDA implementation. In calendar year 2017, a total of 4062 SDA patients reported urgency; their estimated savings in charges compared with an ED visit were $580 866 in professional fees and $3 176 484 in hospital charges.
Conclusions and relevance: Same-day access appears to be less expensive and to require less time in the health care system than a visit to the ED for an ophthalmic diagnosis. Substantial savings in time and money might be achieved if urgent eye care is delivered in the clinic rather than the ED.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Improving Same-Day Access in Ophthalmology.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):736-737. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0915. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31021389 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Visit Durations and Referral Attendance for Pediatric Ocular Conditions Seen in Emergency and Urgent Care Settings.Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251326319. doi: 10.1177/00469580251326319. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Inquiry. 2025. PMID: 40071645 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Dedicated Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Reducing Cost and Improving Access to Orthopaedic Care.J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Dec;30 Suppl 5:S3-S6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000712. J Orthop Trauma. 2016. PMID: 27870667
-
After-hours pediatric care compared with emergency department care: a retrospective charge analysis.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Apr;54(4):324-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922815574678. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015. PMID: 25802419
-
Comparison of methods for measuring crowding and its effects on length of stay in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1269-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01232.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 22168190 Review.
-
The impact of improved access to after-hours primary care on emergency department and primary care utilization: A systematic review.Health Policy. 2020 Aug;124(8):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 27. Health Policy. 2020. PMID: 32513447
Cited by
-
Retrospective Optimization of the Hawkeye Orbital Fracture Prioritization and Evaluation Algorithms for Triaging Ophthalmic Care.Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Dec 10;4(3):100447. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100447. eCollection 2024 May-Jun. Ophthalmol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38284103 Free PMC article.
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Visit Durations and Referral Attendance for Pediatric Ocular Conditions Seen in Emergency and Urgent Care Settings.Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251326319. doi: 10.1177/00469580251326319. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Inquiry. 2025. PMID: 40071645 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare disparities contribute to missed follow-up visits after cataract surgery in the USA: results from the perioperative care for intraocular lens study.BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 17;11(3):e038565. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038565. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33737416 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization trends of an ophthalmology-specific emergency department: the Massachusetts Eye and Ear experience.Digit J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 12;26(4):31-35. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2020.02.002. eCollection 2021 Feb. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33867880 Free PMC article.
-
An emergency room influx and trauma cases prediction in a Brazilian ophthalmological hospital by an ophthalmologist without code experience.Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2022 Nov 4;87(3):e2022-0130. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2022-0130. Online ahead of print. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2022. PMID: 36350913 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vegting IL, Alam N, Ghanes K, et al. . What are we waiting for? factors influencing completion times in an academic and peripheral emergency department. Neth J Med. 2015;73(7):331-340. - PubMed