Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):729-735.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0864.

Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department

Eric L Singman et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Convenient outpatient access for ophthalmology patients seeking urgent care could offer savings compared with an emergency department (ED) visit.

Objective: To evaluate the costs and visit durations of same-day access (SDA) in an ophthalmology department at an academic medical center vs ED care.

Design, setting, and participants: This single-center study was a retrospective quality improvement analysis of an institutional electronic medical record system at the Wilmer Eye Institute clinics and the Johns Hopkins Hospital ED. On June 1, 2015, the Wilmer Eye Institute and Johns Hopkins Hospital initiated an official policy of providing SDA to patients calling for appointments (ie, the same-day project). All ophthalmology clinic locations created same-day appointment slots for at least 1 practitioner. In recognition of seasonal variations in patient visit volumes, the 10 months before implementation (August 1, 2014, to May 31, 2015) were compared with complementary periods in 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017.

Main outcomes and measures: The study tabulated encounters, charges, and visit length for outpatients seen on the same day or by previously scheduled appointments. For the ED patients, volume, diagnoses, charges, and length of stay data were collected. The numbers of SDA patients who indicated urgency were tabulated.

Results: The number of SDA patients increased from 22 781 to 26 579 for the first year after SDA implementation. The mean charge was $258 (95% CI, $250-$266; median, $184; interquartile range [IQR], $175-$320), and the mean clinic transit time was 1.55 hours (95% CI, 1.54-1.57 hours; median, 1.28 hours). For patients seeking eye care in the ED, the mean professional fee was $401 (95% CI, $390-$411; median, $360; IQR, $255-$500), the mean (SD) total hospital charge was $1040 ($999) (95% CI, $729-$1079; median, $1002; IQR, $334-$1429), and the mean length of stay was 7.30 hours (95% CI, 7.01-7.57 hours; median, 7.20 hours). The top 4 ophthalmic diagnoses for ED patients were conjunctivitis, cornea abrasion, iritis, and visual loss, which were unchanged after SDA implementation. In calendar year 2017, a total of 4062 SDA patients reported urgency; their estimated savings in charges compared with an ED visit were $580 866 in professional fees and $3 176 484 in hospital charges.

Conclusions and relevance: Same-day access appears to be less expensive and to require less time in the health care system than a visit to the ED for an ophthalmic diagnosis. Substantial savings in time and money might be achieved if urgent eye care is delivered in the clinic rather than the ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Boland reported receiving personal fees from Heidelberg Engineering and grants from Alcon outside the submitted work. Dr McDonnell reported serving as an independent board member of Allergan Plc. Dr Srikumaran reported receiving personal fees from Alcon outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

  • Improving Same-Day Access in Ophthalmology.
    Donahue SP, Sternberg P Jr. Donahue SP, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):736-737. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0915. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31021389 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yarmohammadian MH, Rezaei F, Haghshenas A, Tavakoli N. Overcrowding in emergency departments: a review of strategies to decrease future challenges. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:23. doi:10.4103/1735-1995.200277 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahadori M, Teymourzadeh E, Ravangard R, Raadabadi M. Factors affecting the overcrowding in outpatient healthcare. J Educ Health Promot. 2017;6:21. doi:10.4103/2277-9531.204742 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solberg RG, Edwards BL, Chidester JP, Perina DG, Brady WJ, Williams MD. The prehospital and hospital costs of emergency care for frequent ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):459-463. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vegting IL, Alam N, Ghanes K, et al. . What are we waiting for? factors influencing completion times in an academic and peripheral emergency department. Neth J Med. 2015;73(7):331-340. - PubMed
    1. Erenler AK, Akbulut S, Guzel M, et al. . Reasons for overcrowding in the emergency department: experiences and suggestions of an education and research hospital. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;14(2):59-63. doi:10.5505/1304.7361.2014.48802 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types