Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jun:66:1-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Interventions involving a major dietary component improve cognitive function in cognitively healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions involving a major dietary component improve cognitive function in cognitively healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Claire T McEvoy et al. Nutr Res. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests a role for diet in promoting brain health. The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) quantitatively assess whether interventions with a major dietary component can enhance cognition in cognitively healthy adults and (2) identify responsive domains of cognition to inform the design of future dietary trials. Electronic databases were systematically searched to find eligible randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of interventions with a major dietary component on cognitive function or incident dementia in adults without known cognitive impairment. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis, and tests of homogeneity of variance were calculated. Two trials reported dementia outcomes and were qualitatively described. Fifteen trials encompassing 6480 participants were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared to control, intervention improved performance on measures of global cognition (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-0.27, P = .05, I2 76%), executive function (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.18, P = .003, I2 0%), and processing speed (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.19, P = .001, I2 0%). There was no effect of intervention on delayed memory (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.09, P = .18, I2 4%). Significant heterogeneity and funnel plot asymmetry were detected for global cognition, but removal of studies with high risk of bias did not change the pooled findings. Current evidence is limited but indicates that diverse interventions improve nonmemory cognitive functions during normal cognitive aging. Measures of executive function and processing speed should be considered as feasible end points in future dietary intervention trials.

Keywords: Cognitive function; Dementia; Diet; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources