Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug;28(1):128-134.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677903. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications

Farah Magrabi et al. Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: This paper draws attention to: i) key considerations for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) enabled clinical decision support; and ii) challenges and practical implications of AI design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance.

Method: A narrative review of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems.

Results: There is a rich history and tradition of evaluating AI in healthcare. While evaluators can learn from past efforts, and build on best practice evaluation frameworks and methodologies, questions remain about how to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AI that dynamically harness vast amounts of genomic, biomarker, phenotype, electronic record, and care delivery data from across health systems. This paper first provides a historical perspective about the evaluation of AI in healthcare. It then examines key challenges of evaluating AI-enabled clinical decision support during design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance. Practical aspects of evaluating AI in healthcare, including approaches to evaluation and indicators to monitor AI are also discussed.

Conclusion: Commitment to rigorous initial and ongoing evaluation will be critical to ensuring the safe and effective integration of AI in complex sociotechnical settings. Specific enhancements that are required for the new generation of AI-enabled clinical decision support will emerge through practical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Coiera E.The fate of medicine in the time of AI Lancet 2018. Dec 1392(10162)2331–2. - PubMed
    1. Yu K H, Kohane I S. Framing the challenges of artificial intelligence in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:238–41. - PubMed
    1. Yu K-H, Beam A L, Kohane I. S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(10):719–31. - PubMed
    1. Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, Gompels L, Edwards T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:231–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanagasingam Y, Xiao D, Vignarajan J, Preetham A, Tay-Kearney M-L, Mehrotra A. Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary CareArtificial Intelligence–Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care Artificial Intelligence–Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(05):e182665-e. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms