Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 18;49(3):789-794.
doi: 10.3906/sag-1811-50.

Validation and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Neuroquality of Life (Neuro-QoL)-Stigma Scale for neurological disorders

Sibel Karşıdağ  1 , Nilgün Çınar  1 , Şevki Şahin  1 , Nurdan Kotevoğlu  2 , Miruna Florentina Ateş  1
Affiliations

Validation and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Neuroquality of Life (Neuro-QoL)-Stigma Scale for neurological disorders

Sibel Karşıdağ et al. Turk J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background/aim: Stigma can be defined as a negative perception of chronically ill patients by their relatives or by society, or a similar self-perception by the patients themselves. We aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Neuroquality of Life (Neuro-QoL)-Stigma Scale for neurologic diseases.

Materials and methods: Forms were filled out by a total of 152 randomized patients under regular follow-up in the outpatient clinic (29 polyneuropathy, 25 epilepsy, 23 stroke, 24 tension-type headache, 28 multiple sclerosis, 27 Parkinson disease). The forms consisted of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scale, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) scale, and the Neuro-QoL-Stigma scale.

Results: The internal consistency of the Neuro-QoL-Stigma scale showed Cronbach’s α coefficients of 0.95 for all groups. The mean scores of the stigma scales were 33.42 ± 13.91 (min–max: 24–87). There were strong negative correlations between high stigma scores and GSE-T, MSPSS-T, and WHOQOL-BREF, and a positive correlation with the BDI and BAI.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of Neuro-QoL-Stigma has satisfactory content validity and high internal consistency. Neuro-QoL-Stigma is suitable for understanding stigmatization in different neurological disorders in the Turkish population. The scale is available for use at http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/neuro-qol.

Keywords: Stigma; neurology; Neuro-QoL; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

none declared

References

    1. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs. 1963.
    1. Link BG Phelan JC Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:363.
    1. Major B Brien O LT. The social psychology of stigma. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:393. - PubMed
    1. A historical framework for social epidemiology. Social Epidemiology. 2000. p. 3.
    1. Kabay SC Toğrol E Mestan E. Nörolojik hastalıklarda stigmatizasyon ve ölçümü. Turkish Journal of Neurology. 2014;20:91.

Publication types