Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 5:10:671.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671. eCollection 2019.

Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review

Karina K L Mak et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The impostor phenomenon is a pervasive psychological experience of perceived intellectual and professional fraudulence. It is not a diagnosable condition yet observed in clinical and normal populations. Increasingly, impostorism research has expanded beyond clinical and into applied settings. However, to date, a systematic review examining the methodological quality of impostorism measures used to conduct such research has yet to be carried out. This systematic review examines trait impostor phenomenon measures and evaluates their psychometric properties against a quality assessment framework. Systematic searches were carried out on six electronic databases, seeking original empirical studies examining the conceptualization, development, or validation of self-report impostor phenomenon scales. A subsequent review of reference lists also included two full-text dissertations. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were specified to select the final 18 studies in the review sample. Of the studies included, four measures of the impostor phenomenon were identified and their psychometric properties assessed against the quality appraisal tool-Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, Harvey Impostor Scale, Perceived Fraudulence Scale, and Leary Impostor Scale. The findings often highlighted that studies did not necessarily report poor psychometric properties; rather an absence of data and stringent assessment criteria resulted in lower methodological ratings. Recommendations for future research are made to address the conceptual clarification of the construct's dimensionality, to improve future study quality and to enable better discrimination between measures.

Keywords: impostor phenomenon; impostorism; measure; psychometric; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.

References

    1. American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.CautionaryStatement - DOI
    1. Bechtoldt M. N. (2015). Wanted: Self-doubting employees-Managers scoring positively on impostorism favor insecure employees in task delegation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 86, 482–486. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.002 - DOI
    1. Brauer K., Wolf A. (2016). Validation of the German-language Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (GCIPS). Pers. Individ. Dif. 102, 153–158. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.071 - DOI
    1. Chae J. H., Piedmont R. L., Estadt B. K., Wicks R. J. (1995). Personological evaluation of Clance's impostor phenomenon scale in a Korean sample. J. Pers. Assess. 65, 468–485. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_7 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types