Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;32(2):239-246.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01203-9. Epub 2019 Apr 27.

Gait in patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures over 6 months of recovery

Affiliations

Gait in patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures over 6 months of recovery

Eva Jacobs et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: One factor related to disability in people with spinal deformity is decreased postural control and increased risk of falling. However, little is known about the effect of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and their recovery on gait and stability. Walking characteristics of older adults with and without vertebral fractures have not yet been compared.

Aims: The purpose of the current study was to examine the spatiotemporal gait parameters and their variability in patients with an OVCF and healthy participants during treadmill walking at baseline and after 6 months of recovery.

Methods: Twelve female patients suffering a symptomatic OVCF were compared to 11 matched controls. Gait analysis was performed with a dual-belt instrumented treadmill with a 180° projection screen providing a virtual environment (computer-assisted rehabilitation environment). Results of patients with an OVCF and healthy participants were compared. Furthermore, spatiotemporal gait parameters were assessed over 6 months following the fracture.

Results: Patients suffering from an OVCF appeared to walk with significantly shorter, faster and wider strides compared to their healthy counterparts. Although stride time and length improved over time, the majority of the parameters analysed remained unchanged after 6 months of conservative treatment.

Discussion: Since patients do not fully recover to their previous level of mobility after 6 months of conservative treatment for OVCF, it appears of high clinical importance to add balance and gait training to the treatment algorithm of OVCFs.

Conclusions: Patients suffering from an OVCF walk with shorter, faster and wider strides compared to their healthy counterparts adopt a less stable body configuration in the anterior direction, potentially increasing their risk of forward falls if perturbed. Although stride time and stride length improve over time even reaching healthy levels again, patients significantly deviate from normal gait patterns (e.g. in stability and step width) after 6 months of conservative treatment.

Keywords: Ageing spine; Gait analysis; OVCF; Spatiotemporal gait parameters; Vertebral fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stride time, stride length, step width and double support time in patients with an OVCF at baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T1) and after 6 months (T2). Repeated measurements ANOVA demonstrated a significant improvement over time for stride time and length. There was no significant improvement in step width and double support time over time. Data presented for each patient, horizontal bar represents median with 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Margins of stability in the anteroposterior and mediolateral direction in patients with an OVCF at baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T1) and after 6 months (T2). Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant differences over time. Data are presented for each patient; horizontal bar represents median with 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Self-selected walking speed in patients with an OVCF at baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T1) and after 6 months (T2). There was a significant improvement over time. Data are presented for each patient; horizontal bar represents median with 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1726–1733. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luthman S, Widen J, Borgstrom F. Appropriateness criteria for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:793–804. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4348-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, et al. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:206–213. doi: 10.1007/s001980050138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285:320–323. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.3.320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ailon T, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, et al. Progressive spinal kyphosis in the aging population. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:S164–S172. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000944. - DOI - PubMed