Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2233-2260.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050

Collaborators

Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050

Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Lancet. .

Erratum in

  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01806-7. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34509230 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive and comparable estimates of health spending in each country are a key input for health policy and planning, and are necessary to support the achievement of national and international health goals. Previous studies have tracked past and projected future health spending until 2040 and shown that, with economic development, countries tend to spend more on health per capita, with a decreasing share of spending from development assistance and out-of-pocket sources. We aimed to characterise the past, present, and predicted future of global health spending, with an emphasis on equity in spending across countries.

Methods: We estimated domestic health spending for 195 countries and territories from 1995 to 2016, split into three categories-government, out-of-pocket, and prepaid private health spending-and estimated development assistance for health (DAH) from 1990 to 2018. We estimated future scenarios of health spending using an ensemble of linear mixed-effects models with time series specifications to project domestic health spending from 2017 through 2050 and DAH from 2019 through 2050. Data were extracted from a broad set of sources tracking health spending and revenue, and were standardised and converted to inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. Incomplete or low-quality data were modelled and uncertainty was estimated, leading to a complete data series of total, government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending, and DAH. Estimates are reported in 2018 US dollars, 2018 purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars, and as a percentage of gross domestic product. We used demographic decomposition methods to assess a set of factors associated with changes in government health spending between 1995 and 2016 and to examine evidence to support the theory of the health financing transition. We projected two alternative future scenarios based on higher government health spending to assess the potential ability of governments to generate more resources for health.

Findings: Between 1995 and 2016, health spending grew at a rate of 4·00% (95% uncertainty interval 3·89-4·12) annually, although it grew slower in per capita terms (2·72% [2·61-2·84]) and increased by less than $1 per capita over this period in 22 of 195 countries. The highest annual growth rates in per capita health spending were observed in upper-middle-income countries (5·55% [5·18-5·95]), mainly due to growth in government health spending, and in lower-middle-income countries (3·71% [3·10-4·34]), mainly from DAH. Health spending globally reached $8·0 trillion (7·8-8·1) in 2016 (comprising 8·6% [8·4-8·7] of the global economy and $10·3 trillion [10·1-10·6] in purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars), with a per capita spending of US$5252 (5184-5319) in high-income countries, $491 (461-524) in upper-middle-income countries, $81 (74-89) in lower-middle-income countries, and $40 (38-43) in low-income countries. In 2016, 0·4% (0·3-0·4) of health spending globally was in low-income countries, despite these countries comprising 10·0% of the global population. In 2018, the largest proportion of DAH targeted HIV/AIDS ($9·5 billion, 24·3% of total DAH), although spending on other infectious diseases (excluding tuberculosis and malaria) grew fastest from 2010 to 2018 (6·27% per year). The leading sources of DAH were the USA and private philanthropy (excluding corporate donations and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). For the first time, we included estimates of China's contribution to DAH ($644·7 million in 2018). Globally, health spending is projected to increase to $15·0 trillion (14·0-16·0) by 2050 (reaching 9·4% [7·6-11·3] of the global economy and $21·3 trillion [19·8-23·1] in purchasing-power parity-adjusted dollars), but at a lower growth rate of 1·84% (1·68-2·02) annually, and with continuing disparities in spending between countries. In 2050, we estimate that 0·6% (0·6-0·7) of health spending will occur in currently low-income countries, despite these countries comprising an estimated 15·7% of the global population by 2050. The ratio between per capita health spending in high-income and low-income countries was 130·2 (122·9-136·9) in 2016 and is projected to remain at similar levels in 2050 (125·9 [113·7-138·1]). The decomposition analysis identified governments' increased prioritisation of the health sector and economic development as the strongest factors associated with increases in government health spending globally. Future government health spending scenarios suggest that, with greater prioritisation of the health sector and increased government spending, health spending per capita could more than double, with greater impacts in countries that currently have the lowest levels of government health spending.

Interpretation: Financing for global health has increased steadily over the past two decades and is projected to continue increasing in the future, although at a slower pace of growth and with persistent disparities in per-capita health spending between countries. Out-of-pocket spending is projected to remain substantial outside of high-income countries. Many low-income countries are expected to remain dependent on development assistance, although with greater government spending, larger investments in health are feasible. In the absence of sustained new investments in health, increasing efficiency in health spending is essential to meet global health targets.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health spending per capita in 1995 (A), 2016 (B), 2030 (C), and 2050 (D) Reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. 2030 and 2050 values are reference scenarios. This figure was remade but with health spending measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, and is included in the appendix. ATG=Antigua and Barbuda. VCT=Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. LCA=Saint Lucia. TTO=Trinidad and Tobago. Isl=Islands. FSM=Federated States of Micronesia. TLS=Timor-Leste.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Health spending per capita in 1995 (A), 2016 (B), 2030 (C), and 2050 (D) Reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. 2030 and 2050 values are reference scenarios. This figure was remade but with health spending measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, and is included in the appendix. ATG=Antigua and Barbuda. VCT=Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. LCA=Saint Lucia. TTO=Trinidad and Tobago. Isl=Islands. FSM=Federated States of Micronesia. TLS=Timor-Leste.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Health spending per capita by gross domestic product per capita, for 1995, 2016, 2030, and 2050 Health spending per capita and gross domestic product per capita are reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. The lines are the trend lines reflecting model fit for each year. 2030 and 2050 values are reference scenarios. Each dot represents a country-year estimate, with the colours representing different years (1995, 2016, 2030, and 2050). The x-axis is presented in natural logarithmic scale. This figure was remade but with health spending measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, and is included in the appendix.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Annualised rate of change in health spending per capita by source, by World Bank income group (A) and GBD super-region (B), 1995–2016 Error bars represent 95% uncertainty intervals. This figure was remade but with health spending measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, and is included in the appendix. GBD=Global Burden of Disease.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Factors of change in government health spending per capita, 1995–2016 Change in government health spending per capita by global (A), high-income (B), and low-income and middle-income countries (C), reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. Error bars represent uncertainty intervals. Black dots represent the estimated change in government spending per capita. GBD=Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. GDP=gross domestic product.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Economic development and the composition of health spending by source and proportion of health spending from the government in 2016 Composition by source (A) and proportion of health spending from the government (B). Each dot represents a country colour-coded by World Bank income group. Gross domestic product per capita reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. The x-axes are presented in natural logarithmic scale.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Changes in development assistance for health disbursements, 1990–2018 Development assistance for health by source of funding (A), channel of assistance (B), health focus area (C), and annualised rate of change by health focus area (D). Reported in billions of inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. World Bank includes the International Development Association and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD); and regional development banks include the Inter-American Development Bank, the African Development Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. CEPI=Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. Gates Foundation=Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Gavi=Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. NGOs=non-governmental organisations. PAHO=Pan American Health Organization. *Data for 2018 are preliminary estimates based on budget data and estimation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Distribution of government health spending per capita, globally and by income group, for 1995, 2016, 2030, 2050, and two future scenarios Reported in inflation-adjusted 2018 US dollars. 2050 scenario 1 reflects the increase in government health spending if all countries met the target proportion of government spending on health. 2050 scenario 2 reflects the increase in government health spending if all countries met the target proportion of government spending on health and target proportion of gross domestic product that is based on government spending. The x-axes are presented in a natural logarithmic scale. This figure was remade with health spending measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, and is included in the appendix.

Comment in

  • Brazil's health-care system.
    Demo MLO, Orth LC, Marcon CEM. Demo MLO, et al. Lancet. 2019 Nov 30;394(10213):1992. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32630-3. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31789219 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . WHO; 2010. World Health Report 2010—health systems financing: the path to universal coverage.https://www.who.int/whr/2010/en/ - PMC - PubMed
    2. WH, orld Health Report 2010—health systems financing: the path to universal coverag, e 201, 0 WH, ttps://www.who.int/whr/2010/en/
    1. Gottret P, Schieber G. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; Washington, DC: 2006. Health financing revisited: a practioner's guide.https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7094
    2. P Gottret, G Schieber. Health financing revisited: a practioner's guid, e 200, 6 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Ban, ashington, D, ttps://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7094
    1. Reeves A, Gourtsoyannis Y, Basu S, McCoy D, McKee M, Stuckler D. Financing universal health coverage—effects of alternative tax structures on public health systems: cross-national modelling in 89 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2015;386:274–280. - PMC - PubMed
    2. A Reeves, Y Gourtsoyannis, S Basu, D McCoy, M McKee, D Stuckler. Financing universal health coverage—effects of alternative tax structures on public health systems: cross-national modelling in 89 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet, 386, 2015, 274–280 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet. 2003;362:111–117. - PubMed
    2. K Xu, DB Evans, K Kawabata, R Zeramdini, J Klavus, CJ Murray. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet, 362, 2003, 111–117 - PubMed
    1. Bokhari FAS, Gai Y, Gottret P. Government health expenditures and health outcomes. Health Econ. 2007;16:257–273. - PubMed
    2. FAS Bokhari, Y Gai, P Gottret. Government health expenditures and health outcomes. Health Econ, 16, 2007, 257–273 - PubMed

MeSH terms