Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 12:10:809.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00809. eCollection 2019.

Response Modifiers: Tweaking the Immune Response Against Influenza A Virus

Affiliations
Review

Response Modifiers: Tweaking the Immune Response Against Influenza A Virus

Husni Elbahesh et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Despite causing pandemics and yearly epidemics that result in significant morbidity and mortality, our arsenal of options to treat influenza A virus (IAV) infections remains limited and is challenged by the virus itself. While vaccination is the preferred intervention strategy against influenza, its efficacy is reduced in the elderly and infants who are most susceptible to severe and/or fatal infections. In addition, antigenic variation of IAV complicates the production of efficacious vaccines. Similarly, effectiveness of currently used antiviral drugs is jeopardized by the development of resistance to these drugs. Like many viruses, IAV is reliant on host factors and signaling-pathways for its replication, which could potentially offer alternative options to treat infections. While host-factors have long been recognized as attractive therapeutic candidates against other viruses, only recently they have been targeted for development as IAV antivirals. Future strategies to combat IAV infections will most likely include approaches that alter host-virus interactions on the one hand or dampen harmful host immune responses on the other, with the use of biological response modifiers (BRMs). In principle, BRMs are biologically active agents including antibodies, small peptides, and/or other (small) molecules that can influence the immune response. BRMs are already being used in the clinic to treat malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Repurposing such agents would allow for accelerated use against severe and potentially fatal IAV infections. In this review, we will address the potential therapeutic use of different BRM classes to modulate the immune response induced after IAV infections.

Keywords: antiviral; immune response; immunomodulators; influenza; response modifiers; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biological response modifiers (BRMs). Potentially therapeutic BRMs that have shown antiviral/immunomodulatory effects during in vivo IV infections. Schematic organizing BRMs based on BRM class, host/virus targets, compounds used in cited studies (from innermost to outermost ring). FDA-approved BRMs cited in this review are in bold and italics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van de Sandt CE, Kreijtz JH, Rimmelzwaan GF. Evasion of influenza A viruses from innate and adaptive immune responses. Viruses. (2012) 4:1438–76. 10.3390/v4091438 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X, Liu S, Goraya MU, Maarouf M, Huang S, Chen JL. Host immune response to influenza A virus infection. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:320. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00320 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Innate immunity to virus infection. Immunol Rev. (2009) 227:75–86. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00737.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blasius AL, Beutler B. Intracellular toll-like receptors. Immunity. (2010) 32:305–15. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pang IK, Iwasaki A. Inflammasomes as mediators of immunity against influenza virus. Trends Immunol. (2011) 32:34–41. 10.1016/j.it.2010.11.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms