Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep-Oct;9(5):e531.
doi: 10.1002/wcc.531. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes

Stefano Carattini  1   2 , Maria Carvalho  2 , Sam Fankhauser  2
Affiliations
Review

Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes

Stefano Carattini et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2018 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Carbon taxes represent a cost-effective way to steer the economy toward a greener future. In the real world, their application has however been limited. In this paper, we address one of the main obstacles to carbon taxes: public opposition. We identify drivers of and barriers to public support, and, under the form of stylized facts, provide general lessons on the acceptability of carbon taxes. We derive our lessons from a growing literature, as well as from a combination of policy "failures" and "successes." Based on our stylized facts, we formulate a set of suggestions concerning the design of carbon taxes. We consider the use of trial periods, tax escalators, environmental earmarking, lump-sum transfers, tax rebates, and advanced communication strategies, among others. This paper contributes to the policy debate about carbon taxes, hopefully leading to more success stories and fewer policy failures. This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Economics of Mitigation.

Keywords: acceptability; carbon pricing; carbon taxes; public support; revenue recycling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted percentage of votes in favor of a carbon tax, by carbon tax rates. Note. Filled circles indicate observation in the sample; empty circles indicate observations obtained through extrapolation. In this scenario, the choice experiment assumed that revenues would be used to reduce the value‐added tax, as in the referendum case. (Reprinted with permission from Carattini et al. (2017). © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/))
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alberini, A. , Scasny, M. , & Bigano, A . (2016). Policy vs individual heterogeneity in the benefits of climate change mitigation: Evidence from a stated‐preference survey (FEEM Working Paper No. 80.2016). Milan, Italy: FEEM
    1. Aldy, J. E. , & Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. The Journal of Environment and Development, 21(2), 152–180.
    1. Andersson, D. , & Nässén, J. (2016). The Gothenburg Congestion Charge Scheme: A pre–post analysis of commuting behavior and travel satisfaction. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 82–89.
    1. Andersson, J . (2015). Cars, carbon taxes and CO 2 emissions (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper 212/Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper 238). London, England: London School of Economics and Political Science.
    1. Ares, E. , & Delebarre, J. (2016). The carbon price floor. London, England: UK House of Commons Library; Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05927/SN05927.pdf

LinkOut - more resources