Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;61(6):843-858.
doi: 10.1002/dev.21860. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Emotion in motion: Facial dynamics affect infants' neural processing of emotions

Affiliations

Emotion in motion: Facial dynamics affect infants' neural processing of emotions

Ermanno Quadrelli et al. Dev Psychobiol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Research investigating the early development of emotional processing has focused mainly on infants' perception of static facial emotional expressions, likely restricting the amount and type of information available to infants. In particular, the question of whether dynamic information in emotional facial expressions modulates infants' neural responses has been rarely investigated. The present study aimed to fill this gap by recording 7-month-olds' event-related potentials to static (Study 1) and dynamic (Study 2) happy, angry, and neutral faces. In Study 1, happy faces evoked a faster right-lateralized negative central (Nc) component compared to angry faces. In Study 2, both happy and angry faces elicited a larger right-lateralized Nc compared to neutral faces. Irrespective of stimulus dynamicity, a larger P400 to angry faces was associated with higher scores on the Negative Affect temperamental dimension. Overall, results suggest that 7-month-olds are sensitive to facial dynamics, which might play a role in shaping the neural processing of facial emotional expressions. Results also suggest that the amount of attentional resources infants allocate to angry expressions is associated to their temperamental traits. These findings represent a promising avenue for future studies exploring the neurobiological processes involved in perceiving emotional expressions using dynamic stimuli.

Keywords: attention; emotion; event-related potentials; motion; temperament.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ambadar, Z., Schooler, J. W., & Cohn, J. F. (2005). Deciphering the enigmatic face the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16(5), 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01548.x
    1. Beall, P. M., Moody, E. J., McIntosh, D. N., Hepburn, S. L., & Reed, C. L. (2008). Rapid facial reactions to emotional facial expressions in typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(3), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.004
    1. Biele, C., & Grabowska, A. (2006). Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions. Experimental Brain Research, 171(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0
    1. Bornstein, M. H., & Arterberry, M. E. (2003). Recognition, discrimination and categorization of smiling by 5-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 6(5), 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00314
    1. Bulf, H., & Turati, C. (2010). The role of rigid motion in newborns' face recognition. Visual Cognition, 18(4), 504-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280903272037

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources