Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Primary Care
- PMID: 31032913
- PMCID: PMC6625910
- DOI: 10.1111/head.13543
Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Primary Care
Abstract
Objective: To inform migraine care model development by assessing differences between patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) in the current state of treatment, disability, patient satisfaction, and quality improvement opportunities.
Background: Efficient and focused use of scarce resources will be needed to address challenges within large populations of migraine patients.
Methods: We deployed a cross-sectional survey study of randomly selected migraine patients within a community primary care practice.
Results: There were 516 survey respondents (516/1804 [30%] response rate). CM patients were more likely than EM patients to report care from a neurologist (76/110 [69%] vs 229/406 [56%]; P = .0026), and higher disability according to the Migraine Disability Assessment and Headache Impact Test - 6 questionnaires (P < .0001). CM patients were less likely than EM patients to report overall satisfaction with care (16/110 [38%] vs 156/406 [66%], P = .0002), satisfaction with access to care (17/110 [33%] vs 176/406 [68%], P < .0001), and advice they needed (16/110 [31%] vs 160/406 [62%], P < .0001). Most patients with migraine had been offered triptan medications 377/516 (78%). Overall, 156/516 (31%) of individuals were currently taking any medication for migraine prevention, and 208/516 (40%) including botulinum toxin injections. CM patients were more likely to be taking preventive medication (39/110 [36%] vs 117/406 [29%], P = .0191) and report familiarity with the diagnosis of medication-overuse headache than patients with EM (80/110 [81%] vs 256/406 [69%], P = .0178).
Conclusions: We observed differences between patients with chronic and EM and expected care delivery improvement opportunities for migraine patients in primary care. CM patients report higher levels of disability and less satisfaction with access to perceived needed medical advice and care. These findings support the need to further develop and study novel care models to efficiently and effectively deliver high-quality care and expertise in limited supply to a diverse migraine population.
Keywords: care model; population health; primary care; quality measures; survey; utilization.
© 2019 American Headache Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement:
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest and do not have any disclosures to report.
Similar articles
-
Botulinum toxin type A and acute drug costs in migraine with triptan overuse.Can J Neurol Sci. 2010 Sep;37(5):588-94. doi: 10.1017/s031716710001074x. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010. PMID: 21059503
-
Humanistic, utilization, and cost outcomes associated with the use of botulinum toxin for treatment of refractory migraine headaches in a managed care organization.J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jun;14(5):442-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.5.442. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008. PMID: 18597573 Free PMC article.
-
Similarities and differences between chronic migraine and episodic migraine.Headache. 2007 Jan;47(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00629.x. Headache. 2007. PMID: 17355496
-
Preventive treatment patterns and treatment satisfaction in migraine: results of the OVERCOME (EU) study.J Headache Pain. 2023 Jul 17;24(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01623-z. J Headache Pain. 2023. PMID: 37460942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Applying the benefits of the AwM study in the clinic.Cephalalgia. 2008 Sep;28 Suppl 2:42-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01690.x. Cephalalgia. 2008. PMID: 18715332 Review.
Cited by
-
Chronic Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: A Review of Current Perspectives.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 25;2:705276. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.705276. eCollection 2021. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 35295486 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment pattern and health care resource utilization for Taiwanese patients with migraine: a population-based study.Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1222912. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1222912. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37654430 Free PMC article.
-
Loneliness and Migraine Self-Management: A Cross-Sectional Assessment.J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720924874. doi: 10.1177/2150132720924874. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020. PMID: 32484017 Free PMC article.
-
New Approaches to Shifting the Migraine Treatment Paradigm.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;3:873179. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.873179. eCollection 2022. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36147034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimation of the Impact of Migraine on Self-rated Health: A Cross-sectional Study in Slovenia.Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):38-45. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0007. eCollection 2020 Dec. Zdr Varst. 2020. PMID: 33488821 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical