The role of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for pancreatic, submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent lesions
- PMID: 31034112
- DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12712
The role of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for pancreatic, submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent lesions
Abstract
Background and aim: Our aim was to assess adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens with or without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) from pancreatic, upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) and adjacent masses.
Method: A retrospective cohort study based on patients' files who underwent EUS-FNA in Galilee Medical Center in a 4 years period. Number of needle passes, repeated EUS and ROSE effect on tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy were reported.
Results: One-hundred sixty-one patients were included. Ninety-three patients (57.7%) underwent EUS-FNA without ROSE (group A) compared to 68 patients (42.3%) with ROSE (group B). The most common location was in the pancreas (55% in group A vs 81% in group B). Addition of ROSE yielded a significantly higher specimen adequacy (65% in group A vs 92.6% in group B (Chi-Square < 0.0001, OR 6.72, 95% CI 2.45-18.38). The matching rate (accuracy) between ROSE diagnosis and final histopathological diagnosis was noticed in 61 out of 68 patients (89.7%, 95% CI 0.7993-0.9576). The Kappa coefficient correlations of matching rate between ROSE and final histopathological diagnosis of all lesion and in pancreatic lesions were 0.7558, (95% CI 0.625-0.887) and 0.7814, (95% CI 0.639-0.924), respectively.
Conclusions: EUS-FNA with ROSE significantly improve specimen adequacy and was associated with high diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: accuracy; lesions; pancreas; rapid on-site evaluation; stomach.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:607-620.
-
- Gerritsen A, Molenaar IQ, Bollen TL, et al. Preoperative characteristics of patients with presumed pancreatic cancer but ultimately benign disease: a multicenter series of 344 pancreatoduodenectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3999-4006.
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10-29.
-
- Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1087-1095.
-
- Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705-1710.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
