Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;49(6):1707-1720.
doi: 10.1111/sltb.12553. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Suicide Typologies in the United States Air Force: A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Affiliations

Suicide Typologies in the United States Air Force: A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Jeffery S Martin et al. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: This study describes characteristics of United States Air Force (USAF) suicide decedents and determines subgroups.

Method: Retrospective review of demographic, psychiatric, event-related, and psychosocial variables for USAF suicide decedents in the Suicide Event Surveillance System database was conducted between February 1999 and July 2009 (N = 376). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to determine initial clusters and cluster centroids.

Results: Analyses identified three clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 149) individuals were mostly single or divorced, E-1-E-6 rank, living alone, and less likely to have psychiatric disorder diagnoses or engage with most helping resources. Cluster 2 (n = 126) decedents were mostly married, living with a partner, higher ranking, and least likely to communicate suicide intent. Cluster 3 (n = 101) individuals were mostly E-4-E-6 rank, with the highest rates of most psychiatric diagnoses, previous suicide-related events, engagement with multiple helping resources, communication of intent, and psychosocial precipitants. Clusters differed significantly in marital status, rank, psychiatric diagnoses, precipitants, service utilization, previous suicide-related events, risk factors, communication of intent, location and method of death, and residential status.

Conclusions: This study identifies empirically based suicide typologies within a military decedent sample. While further research and replications of findings are needed, these typologies have clinical and policy implications for military suicide prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    1. Arensman, E., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. (1996). Classification of attempted suicide: A review of empirical studies, 1963-1993. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26(1), 46-67.
    1. Arsenault-Lapierre, G., Kim, C., & Turecki, G. (2004). Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-4-37.
    1. Baechler, J. (1979). Suicides. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    1. Bardon, C., Cote, L. P., & Mishara, B. L. (2016). Cluster analysis of characteristics of persons who died by suicide in the Montreal metro transit: Analysis of variations over time. Crisis, 37(5), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000398.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources